Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Social Security’s Trust Fund Headed For Bust In 2035
IBD's Capital Hill ^ | 2/8/2011 | Jed Graham

Posted on 02/09/2011 7:29:34 AM PST by Slyscribe

Recent Congressional Budget Office projections show that Social Security will burn through about $600 billion of its promissory notes from the Treasury Department over the coming decade, raising public debt by the same amount.

Overlaying CBO’s 2021 trust fund projection on top of prior Social Security Administration forecasts for 2022 and beyond suggests that the official trust fund exhaustion date could move up two years to 2035, when SSA actuaries release their annual report in the spring.

That may not sound like a cause for urgent action. But take a closer look.

(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.investors.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: budget; retirement; socialsecurity; trustfund
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

1 posted on 02/09/2011 7:29:39 AM PST by Slyscribe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Slyscribe

Misleading...it’s already busted


2 posted on 02/09/2011 7:32:07 AM PST by evad (Every time a RINO is defeated, a liberal cries)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slyscribe

So why the 2% cut this year and is it the employers or employees share?


3 posted on 02/09/2011 7:32:36 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slyscribe

It’s already bankrupt, which is why it’s running on “promisary notes”.

I will gladly pay you Tuesday, for welfare benefits for illegal aliens today.


4 posted on 02/09/2011 7:34:32 AM PST by snowrip (Liberal? You are a socialist idiot with no rational argument.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slyscribe

SS is a pay as you go system. It is in the red now and will go permanently in the red in 2016. The SSTF represents an unfunded liability, which is why it is included in our $14 trillion national debt under “Intragovernmental Holdings.”


5 posted on 02/09/2011 7:35:15 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slyscribe

CBO: Social Security to Run $45 Billion Deficit in 2011 | CNSnews.com
Source: cnsnews.com

(CNSNews.com) – The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) reports that Social Security will effectively run a $45-billion deficit in 2011 and continue to run deficits totaling $547 billion over the coming decade. The admission comes in the CBO’s semi-annual economic review, that projects federal spending, debt, and economic growth. In the report, the CBO also examines the impact of projected economic performance on the trust fund that nominally funds Social Security.


6 posted on 02/09/2011 7:36:27 AM PST by Ev Reeman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: evad

CBO=Madoff Accounting Firm...I predict everyone will be screwed. The Democrats will not like SS now that it is no longer a cash cow. They will be all for “reform”. They need to get it back to being a cash cow for redistribution not an expense.


7 posted on 02/09/2011 7:36:36 AM PST by screaminsunshine (34 States)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Slyscribe

Danger to US: Social security to run on permanent deficits!

URL:http://apnews.myway.com/article/20110127/D9L0BDUG0.html


8 posted on 02/09/2011 7:39:16 AM PST by Ev Reeman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slyscribe

Notice how they assume the BB’ers will live forever.
Just another taxing scam argument.

Same argument was used in the 80’s to “fix” Social Security by raising taxes. OOPS.

Does ANYONE really think that all of the 1st wave of BB’ers are going to live to 100.

We know that the population age groups decline after the BB’ers. Where will all the extra moneies go, general fund?


9 posted on 02/09/2011 7:43:53 AM PST by Marty62 (Marty 60)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slyscribe

There i sno such thing as a social security trust fund. All money goes in to the general fund.


10 posted on 02/09/2011 7:44:00 AM PST by stockpirate (U-6 Total unemployed for January 2011 16.1 percent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slyscribe

There is no such thing as a social security trust fund. All money goes in to the general fund.


11 posted on 02/09/2011 7:44:07 AM PST by stockpirate (U-6 Total unemployed for January 2011 16.1 percent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: screaminsunshine

The Democrats will not like SS now that it is no longer a cash cow.

The government stole the money we put into our SS system for years! Spending like drunk’n sailors on our SS savings. What the hell right did they have to steal this money (or as they like to say borrow). Their pensions, expense accounts and perks should be taken away until they pay back the money. I know that is impossible but so what? My son won’t see the money he is putting in. So in other words, SS will be just another TAX on the American people. All these thieves er,people have to go. They have mismanaged what has been put to their charge. We would be in jail for that kind of reckless business.


12 posted on 02/09/2011 7:44:27 AM PST by Bitsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Slyscribe
Social Security’s Trust Fund Headed For Bust In 2035

There is no Social Security "Trust Fund". Likewise, there is no "lock box" or an account with your name on it. There never was. All Socialist (in)Security receipts go into the general fund of the US Treasury. Socialist (in)Security started paying out more than it takes in several months ago. For all intents and purposes it is broke now. I expect a lot more from IBD. This headline is very misleading.

13 posted on 02/09/2011 7:44:44 AM PST by Thermalseeker (The theft being perpetrated by Congress and the Fed makes Bernie Maddoff look like a pickpocket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bitsy

For years they were able to collect and spend billions more than they paid out. Now they have to pay out billions more than they collect. Thus the Democrats will be for ‘reforming’. In other words screwing the Pooch. I look for Obama to be for bi-partisan reform. Grab your wallet and head for the hills.


14 posted on 02/09/2011 7:48:24 AM PST by screaminsunshine (34 States)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: screaminsunshine

CBO projects Social Security’s Disability Insurance trust fund will run dry in 2017, which would trigger an immediate cut in benefits for disabled workers of about 18% unless Congress takes action, which of course it would have to do.

I wonder if the SSA is still giving SSDI funds to children deemed disabled with Attention Deficit Disorder.


15 posted on 02/09/2011 7:52:23 AM PST by Marty62 (Marty 60)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: evad

Indeed new retirement age will be 90 by the time congress gets done with SS.


16 posted on 02/09/2011 7:53:03 AM PST by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Marty62

Rule one...Never pay any attention at all to anything the CBO says.


17 posted on 02/09/2011 7:59:20 AM PST by screaminsunshine (34 States)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
So why the 2% cut this year and is it the employers or employees share?

Employees' share. The employer portion is unchanged.

18 posted on 02/09/2011 8:00:14 AM PST by Marathoner (Repeal the 17th amendment, and the 16th for good measure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Slyscribe

2035?

Cool!

Ironically, the centennial of the passage of the original Social Security Act.


19 posted on 02/09/2011 8:05:34 AM PST by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaduz
Indeed new retirement age will be 90 by the time congress gets done with SS.

Seriously, if anyone in DC had any stones, they'd propose raising the retirement age to 70 for anyone under age 50 *today*. Immediately.

Since none of us ever expect to see a dime of it anyway, what difference would it make?

20 posted on 02/09/2011 8:09:02 AM PST by bassmaner (Hey commies: I am a white male, and I am guilty of NOTHING! Sell your 'white guilt' elsewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson