Skip to comments.
Christian Super Bowl Ads More Offensive Than Lurid Ads
Intellectual Conservative ^
| February 7, 2011
| Rachel Alexander
Posted on 02/07/2011 11:51:54 AM PST by az4vlad
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
1
posted on
02/07/2011 11:51:58 AM PST
by
az4vlad
To: az4vlad
The offense of the gospel
2
posted on
02/07/2011 11:55:32 AM PST
by
HiTech RedNeck
(I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
To: az4vlad
I forgot about this while I was watching last night.
Most of the commercials were disgusting. Violence seemed to be this year's top theme. Only GoDaddy strikes me as cute, while being slightly risque.
ML/NJ
3
posted on
02/07/2011 11:56:16 AM PST
by
ml/nj
To: az4vlad
The commercial was aired.
4
posted on
02/07/2011 11:57:28 AM PST
by
Perdogg
(What Would Aqua Buddha do?)
To: az4vlad
We see sponsors proving we are living in Idiocracy, where the most popular program is “Oh! My Balls.”
5
posted on
02/07/2011 11:57:45 AM PST
by
kbennkc
(For those who have fought for it, freedom has a flavor the protected will never know.)
To: az4vlad
This year, a commercial featuring a quarterback with "John 3:16" written as dark smudges beneath his eyes was rejected. If it was rejected, why did I see it yesterday?
6
posted on
02/07/2011 11:57:45 AM PST
by
WayneS
(Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm. -- James Madison)
To: HiTech RedNeck
Somehow, the exclusivity of Christianity is VERY offensive,
yet the exclusivity of other religions is not.
Could it be because....
Christianity is the only one that’s true?
7
posted on
02/07/2011 11:58:34 AM PST
by
MrB
(Tagline suspended for important announcement on my about page. Click my handle.)
To: az4vlad
I was very disappointed with Budweiser's "Wild West" ad last night. I thought it was
"gay".
8
posted on
02/07/2011 11:59:01 AM PST
by
FlingWingFlyer
(Why can't the Mexican government provide "a better life" for the illegal aliens? It's their job!)
To: az4vlad
The truths of the Bible are offensive, ... Christ offends men because his gospel is intolerant of sin.
9
posted on
02/07/2011 11:59:13 AM PST
by
wolfman
To: az4vlad
They worry that that will offend somebody, but a finger licking pants smelling perverted commercial or the other one with the cross dresser - is perfectly family friendly viewing.
To: WayneS
Perhaps the local FOX station in your area decided to go a different direction, and to show it. I work in TV production, and when there is a national telecast like this, the network inserts “black” where the commercials should go, or the local programming.
So that’s probably what happened - your local FOX affiliate showed it.
11
posted on
02/07/2011 12:02:28 PM PST
by
Christian4Bush
(Happy New Year. Less than 675 days until we vote out the chaff.)
To: az4vlad
FOX is slowing moving towards the same drek as the MSM is doing now. Soon we won’t know the difference. Shepard Smith seems to be the vanguard of the move to the Left.
12
posted on
02/07/2011 12:03:09 PM PST
by
ReverendJames
(Only A Painter Or A Liberal Can Change Black To White)
To: az4vlad
40% of major sports games contain ads for male-erectile enhancement, something clearly inappropriate for children. Why are erectile dysfunction commercials acceptable while religious advocacy is not?
Not to mention Feminine Hygene Products, when are they
going to run some Male Hygene products like
Wild Stallion Sheath Cleaner, Leaves you feeling like
a stud and Mares like it too...
13
posted on
02/07/2011 12:04:56 PM PST
by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
To: az4vlad
you should probably have this thread removed. Since the ad aired and we all saw it, certain nefarious elements (who LOVE reading FR in secret) will use it against good conservatives.
14
posted on
02/07/2011 12:05:19 PM PST
by
whattajoke
(Let's keep Conservatism real.)
To: az4vlad
I think it’s more of an equal discount of all religious ads which keeps Islam off the air.
Because if they allow a John 3:16 ad, then they will have to show some stupid Islam ad and Fox doesnt want that kind of problem on their hands.
Dumb as it may be, im pretty sure equal disqualification.
15
posted on
02/07/2011 12:08:55 PM PST
by
smith288
(Peace at all costs gives you tyranny free of charge)
To: tet68
Why are erectile dysfunction commercials acceptable while religious advocacy is not? And if they accepted an ad for Christian proselytization, would you be fine if they then allow Muslims to advocate as well? Because I think that's the root of the problem -- if you allow one group to advertise on a subject, you have to allow all groups.
16
posted on
02/07/2011 12:08:59 PM PST
by
kevkrom
(De-fund Obamacare in 2011, repeal in 2013!)
To: kevkrom
WHy do you sya that if you allow one group to evangelize, you HAVE to allow all groups to do so?
What law or regulation requires that?
To: kevkrom
There is no separation of ads and state, or religion,
if someone want’s to pay....do it. It’s part of the
free expression thereof.
18
posted on
02/07/2011 12:20:55 PM PST
by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
To: ml/nj
Violence seemed to be this year's top theme. Pepsi MAX ads were the most violent. I'll not be buying any Pepsi soft drink products.
19
posted on
02/07/2011 12:21:44 PM PST
by
Bloody Sam Roberts
(Tyrants flourish only when they achieve a standing army, an enslaved press, and a disarmed populace.)
To: wolfman
The truths of the Bible are offensive, ... Christ offends men because his gospel is intolerant of sin. Yes, the truth does have a certain intolerance of error. Jesus himself said that men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. It has been that way since the Garden of Eden, and will be that way till the end of time.
20
posted on
02/07/2011 12:28:40 PM PST
by
Mark17
(California, where English is a foreign language)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson