Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AOL To Buy The Huffington Post [$315 Million]
Los Angeles Times ^ | February 06, 2011 | Nathan Olivarez-Giles

Posted on 02/06/2011 9:48:34 PM PST by Steelfish

AOL To Buy The Huffington Post

Nathan Olivarez-Giles February 6, 2011

Arianna Huffington is selling the Huffington Post to AOL Inc. for $315 million in cash.

The deal, which Huffington announced on her blog on the Huffington Post website and AOL announced in a news release, will move the co-founder of the news site to the position of president and editor in chief of a new Huffington Post Media Group division at AOL.

The purchase will increase AOL's news portfolio as it competes against Yahoo's growing online news publication profile and Google's news efforts, as well as traditional media companies online.

Get the monthly that has L.A. talking. Subscribe to Los Angeles Times Magazine at a special introductory rate.

Additional AOL news websites will fall under Huffington's control as well.

In a statement, AOL said it is buying the Huffington Post with about $300 million from on-hand cash. The purchase has yet to acquire government approvals, but the boards of directors of each company and shareholders of the Huffington Post have approved the transaction, AOL said.

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: americaonline; aol; ariannahuffington; huffingtonpost; huffpost; postit123
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last
To: Steelfish

...You have...Hate mail...


21 posted on 02/06/2011 10:18:33 PM PST by BigCinBigD (Northern flags in South winds flutter...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: khnyny

Very true. HuffPo’s formula seems to be a combination of liberalism of the most airheaded kind, celebrity tattle, and bikini pix. I think the perfect HuffPo entry would be something like: “PHOTOS: Megan Fox talks transgender rights IN A TINY BIKINI.”


22 posted on 02/06/2011 10:20:01 PM PST by eater-of-toast ("It is much more important to kill bad bills than to pass good ones." -- Calvin Coolidge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: eater-of-toast

Some of their bloggers post good articles. Others are just nuts!


23 posted on 02/06/2011 10:22:41 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: bigbob
"For that much every AOL shareholder should get Ariana and benefits."

Don't do it!

Every man she has ever slept with has converted to homosexuality.

24 posted on 02/06/2011 10:23:54 PM PST by NoLibZone (Obama must be impeached and tried for treason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MediaMole

MediaMole, khnyny

“AOL has been going heavy into online news for some time.”

Something stinks here. AOL has always been a sleazeball outfit.


25 posted on 02/06/2011 10:24:23 PM PST by haroldeveryman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
I wouldn’t want to see Free Republic sold to the highest bidder!

Me neither -- since FR is fine just the way it is. On the other hand, if a suitable buyer comes along with the right amount of money, it could be beneficial.

There’s too much media concentration already!

In my heart, I tend to embrace that since we all pull for the "little guy". Looking at it pragmatically though, the beauty of an unfettered free marketplace is that a willing buyer and a willing seller can agree on a price without regulation prohibiting such a deal.

In many ways, media concentration has been very good since resources can be more strategically allocated with greater efficiencies. As a stockholder in a media company, I've been nicely rewarded by the growth as a result of such consolidation.

26 posted on 02/06/2011 10:24:31 PM PST by re_nortex (DP...that's what I like about Texas...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: eater-of-toast

Lol. Huffington is the “Globe Magazine” of online yellow journalism.


27 posted on 02/06/2011 10:25:11 PM PST by khnyny (What exactly is a CDO??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: A_Former_Democrat

300 million! But it’s worthless!


28 posted on 02/06/2011 10:28:19 PM PST by Maurice Tift (You can't stop the signal, Mal. You can never stop the signal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

LOL! AOL..........what a HUGE blunder, imo. LOL


29 posted on 02/06/2011 10:30:19 PM PST by NoRedTape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: MediaMole

I’ve been to a few of the lefty “patch” websites, but didn’t know they were part of AOL. It looks like they’re trying to copy the Examiner.

Examiner started out to be pretty decent, but they have too many popups and other ads now.


30 posted on 02/06/2011 10:37:25 PM PST by smokingfrog ( BORN free - taxed to DEATH (and beyond) ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

OK. Instead of not surfing AOL and not surfing Huffpost, I will not surf AOL/Huffpost.


31 posted on 02/06/2011 10:44:12 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: re_nortex
I think it's time to up our freepathon donations.
32 posted on 02/06/2011 10:47:26 PM PST by sanescold
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: abb
A fool and their money ping ...
33 posted on 02/06/2011 10:52:25 PM PST by Zakeet (Always trust in the five G's: God, Gold, Guns, Grub, and the Government screwing up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Saudis recycling money. They were putting tons of money in HP during the primaries to support Obama on Huff Po. Al Waleed owns a lot of Time Warner plus Fox plus Disney.

The media and TV are total sh*t plus evil.


34 posted on 02/06/2011 10:53:43 PM PST by Frantzie (HD TV - Total Brain-washing now in High Def. 3-D Coming soon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop; Steelfish; A_Former_Democrat
Its funny... ten years ago the buzzword was how TIME and AOL would seamlessly bridge the Internet and print worlds.

Time-Warner had high speed internet service as early as 2000, but AOL instead of using its software to make the online service better than its competitors high speed services, tried to keep its software separate. They had much better online email software for its own AOL service than they let Time-Warner use on its Road Runner high speed internet service. SBC and later, AT&T after being acquired by its former subsidiary, have much better online email software using YAHOO! since 2003.

35 posted on 02/06/2011 10:59:30 PM PST by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Why would anyone spend that amount of money for junk like that?


36 posted on 02/06/2011 11:14:06 PM PST by MamaB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
I call AOL = Americal Offline and
Internet for the REAL DUMMIES!!

Now I see they are really becoming bigger DUmmies.

For the Huffington comPOST to call itself a web news site is terribly misleading to say the least, but then again the MSM seems to be a race among themselves to see who can reach the bottom of the barrel first.

37 posted on 02/06/2011 11:31:00 PM PST by prophetic (0Bama = 1 illegal president = 32 illegal, unconstitutional & unnecessary CZARS to do his job!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: qam1
The likes of AIR AMERICA (that liberal craptrap of a new radio out of NY) immediately comes to mind.

AOL will soon be regretting this.

38 posted on 02/06/2011 11:33:05 PM PST by prophetic (0Bama = 1 illegal president = 32 illegal, unconstitutional & unnecessary CZARS to do his job!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

aol have a long history of buying junk at its peak then sitting on it and allowing it to decay


39 posted on 02/06/2011 11:47:50 PM PST by 4rcane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MediaMole
The city my business is located in has a patch site. They came and checked out my shop, asked a bunch of questions, snapped some photos and wrote the story up. Rather fair, however I wish I had the final call on what was published. They got a few things wrong (I am a specialty business)..

There was no liberal or conservative slant to the article. Just a “hey, there's a new business in town, go check it out!” post. And trust me, in my line of work, you can go off the left end quickly with bashing me.

Can't say it brought a lot of people in, but I did get a few.

40 posted on 02/07/2011 12:41:33 AM PST by cableguymn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson