Posted on 02/06/2011 6:59:19 AM PST by tobyhill
Sarah Palin blasted the Obama administration's handling of the Egypt crisis on Saturday in an interview with the Christian Broadcasting Network.
"This is that 3 a.m. White House phone call, and it seems for many of us trying to get that information from our leader in the White House, it seems that that call went right to the answering machine."
Palin's reference to a 3 a.m. phone call referred to the 2008 bruising primary battle between now-President Obama and now-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton over responsiveness to unexpected foreign policy crises.
In the CBN interview, which was conducted Friday immediately following Palin's speech in honor of President Ronald Reagan's 100 birthday but aired Saturday night, the former Alaska governor questioned who might lead Egypt after President Hosni Mubarak if he were to resign.
(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...
The greens are the biggest detriment to our economy out there. We need to identify the players, isolate them and make life unpleasant for them.
so you don’t like Sarah?
>>Includes ghostly fourth rider of the Apocalypse (death) seen in news video of Egypt riots.<<
Lens flair from the fire.
Thanks for the ping!
Thanks ......................... FRegards
You always need to read more than one sentence to get the meaning of anything in the Bible, enjoy!
Thanks for the ping. Great documentation on Islam power creep.
Thanks for that clip of Palin interview on the Egyptian situation.
She’s doing well in her expression of responses to complex situations. There is no doubt in that interview that she understands what she is talking about for the average television viewer. No one can listen to that and then see Chrissy Tingleleg call her stupid and come away agreeing with sissy.
Now if she has gained the ability to derail the left wing media’s gottcha interviews and stunts soomthely like Reagan could do and she avoids being put in a chair with a dishonest radical “news” person like Curic, she’s really going to be successful in a campaign.
This interview also shows that she is thinking independently from McCain and the Rino wing of the party who do nothing but parrot Dear Reader’s (Soros and his Marxist activist organziations and “news” reporters) positions on Egypt in ignoring or downplaying the MB danger to US interests.
It is a huge relief to me to see her chose a line of thought that is totally loyal to the US and wise to the Islamist threat we face.
Sarah Palin is a fool! You can’t she preach states rights at home and be against a revolution in Egypt.
Palin did not say she was against the proposed democracy for Egypt, she said she wants to know who is behind it so we can see if it will really end up being a democracy as billed by protestors and Obama.
If it is the MB that will fill the vacume of leadership in Egypt, the country will only “progressed” from one brutal dictatorship to a different one. The different one - the MB - would be anti-US and harm our interests (it is at war with US and stated it would attack Israel if given power) whereas the current one is not working against us so completely.
In addition, the people of Egypt and the West who really do want a democracy, would not be able to advance their cause with the MB replacing Mubarak in power.
Palin is no fool in her assessment of this situation from a US point of view.
You sure stepped in it that time!
Let me remind you of the 12th commandment; “Thou shalt not blaspheme the name of Sarah Palin!” (Facts and contrary information will not be tolerated or accepted.)
This is a very important issue Palin addressed and she came out on the right side of a complex set of issues and expressed herself well. Merely attacking her with bad names and ignoring the depth of the issues being addressed is inappropriate.
“You can’t she preach states rights at home and be against a revolution in Egypt”
Is English your second language?
I’m guessing your first is Arabic.
It doesn’t appear that you understand.
To say that Palin hasn’t addressed the issues that she has been the only person on the national scene harping on does make you look foolish, or trollish, or even both.
Best way to deal with this type of idiot is to recognize the idiocy and not feed it. I ran into same the other day and allowed myself to engage only to have comment after comment deleted by mods... the idiot I was engaging had no courage and must have been leaning on abuse to save themselves.
There are a lot of these idiotic posts lately... I think they are meant to inflame those who like Palin (hoping to get you banned) and divert you from communicating her message, respecting her as well as giving validity to her possible candidacy.
You may be right, of course, but I’ll engage them for a period. I’m not a Palinbot per se. I really like her, really like her speaking out and what she has to say, but I’m not on the bandwagon (yet) for a 2012 run. I want to see how the field shakes out first.
What bugs me though, is these jerks stirring dissension. They’re not in it for the debate but to cause disruption. That’s a low-life, cheap and it demeans them, and FR by association.
Not a troll — I’m a MAVERICK!
As usual, Sarah is on the right side.
>> “Not a troll — I’m a MAVERICK!” <<
.
Mooo!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.