Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PistolPaknMama
By the way, the foreign citizen usually wants to sue in American court if he can, particularly in tort cases. American tort laws, particularly concerning damages, are unusually generous to the plaintiff. Also, American discovery rules are possibly the most liberal in the world - it's a lot harder to compel the other party to produce evidence in almost any other country.

This was what was going on in the Piper Aircraft case. The plaintiff's definitely wanted the case tried under Pennsylvania or California law, not Scottish law. In Scotland, there was no such thing as a wrongful death claim as we know it in the States. The survivor could only recover for their own "loss of society/loss of consortium" - they could not, as they could under American law, recover for the decedent's medical expenses or pain and suffering or the loss of the decedent's future income.

The point is that you actually see quite a few foreign plaintiffs suing US defendants in US court for things that happened overseas. It happens a lot in products liability cases. You also see it in things like the suits against Union Carbide over the Bhopal disaster, or suits by Indonesian aborigines against Freeport McMoran.
22 posted on 02/04/2011 8:11:39 PM PST by The Pack Knight (Laugh, and the world laughs with you. Weep, and the world laughs at you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: The Pack Knight

Wow, that’s another world from divorces and Section 1983 cases, which are my experience. Interesting stuff, thanks for the insight.


24 posted on 02/04/2011 8:34:27 PM PST by PistolPaknMama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson