Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

67% of Americans Are Dissatisfied With The Size And Influence Of Major Corporations
The Economic Collapse ^ | 02/04/2011 | Michael Snyder

Posted on 02/04/2011 7:58:40 AM PST by SeekAndFind

The American people are becoming increasingly angry about the extraordinary amount of power and influence that corporations have in the United States today. A new Gallup poll found that 67 percent of Americans are dissatisfied with the size and influence of major corporations in the United States today. Not only that, the most recent Chicago Booth/Kellogg School Financial Trust Index found that only 26 percent of Americans trust our financial system at this point. The mainstream media is acting as if this is a new phenomenon, but the truth is that a dislike of giant corporations goes all the way back to the founding of this nation. Our founders held a deep distrust for all big concentrations of power, and they intended to set up a nation where no one person or no one institution could become too powerful.

Unfortunately, we have very much strayed from those principles. In the United States today, the federal government completely dominates all other levels of government and mammoth international corporations completely dominate our economy.

If our founding fathers could see what is going on today they would probably roll over in their graves.

The history of the corporation can be traced back to the early part of the 17th century when Queen Elizabeth I established the East India Trading Company.

Our founders were not too fond of the East India Trading Company. In fact, it was their tea that was dumped into the harbor during the original Boston Tea Party.

In his book entitled "Unequal Protection", Thom Hartman described the great antipathy that our founders had for the East India Trading Company....

"Trade-dominance by the East India Company aroused the greatest passions of America’s Founders – every schoolboy knows how they dumped the Company’s tea into Boston harbour. At the time in Britain virtually all members of parliament were stockholders, a tenth had made their fortunes through the Company, and the Company funded parliamentary elections generously."

So a disgust for great concentrations of financial power is built into our national DNA.

Many people today think of giant international corporations as being synonymous with "capitalism", but that is just not the case.

Our founders envisioned a land where free enterprise could flourish in an environment where no institution held too much power.

So this false left/right debate about whether we should give more power to the government or more power to the corporations is largely a bunch of nonsense.

If the founders were around today they would say that we need to take a lot of power away from both of them.

Fortunately, it looks like the American people are starting to think the same thing. Not only are the American people dissatisfied with government, they are also becoming increasingly dissatisfied with big corporations.

As mentioned above, according to Gallup two-thirds of Americans are now dissatisfied with the size and influence of major corporations in America today....

As you can see, the gap between those in favor of the size and influence of major corporations and those not in favor has been significantly widening over the past decade.

That is a good thing.

Not only that, but the latest Chicago Booth/Kellogg School Financial Trust Index shows that Americans have very little trust in the financial system at this point.

The following are some of the key findings from their most recent report....

*Only 26 percent of Americans trust the nation's financial system.

*Only 13 percent of Americans trust big corporations.

*Only 16 percent of Americans trust the stock market.

*Only 43 percent of Americans trust the banks.

These numbers are staggering, but they should not be surprising. The American people were not pleased at all when the major banks and big financial institutions were showered with bailouts during the recent financial crisis. A lot of that anger is still simmering.

The recent housing collapse, which is still ongoing, was caused in great part by the behavior of the major banks and big financial institutions, but it is the American people which have suffered the most from it. The following very brief animation from Taiwan demonstrates this very humorously....

The American people are still wondering where their "bailouts" are. Most of the big banks and big corporations seem to be thriving even while the number of Americans slipping into poverty continues to grow.

According to Calculated Risk, approximately 15 million Americans are unemployed, about 9 million Americans are working part-time for "economic reasons" and approximately 4 million American workers have left the labor force since the beginning of the economic downturn.

When you total that all up, you get 28 million Americans that wish they had full-time jobs.

Ouch.

There are other numbers that are very disturbing as well. In the month of November, the number of people on food stamps set another new all-time record: 43.6 million Americans.

So we have tens of millions of Americans that can't get the jobs that they want and we have tens of millions of Americans that can't feed themselves without government assistance.

No wonder so many people are angry at the big corporations!

The U.S. government has showered the big corporations and the big banks with bailouts, tax breaks and cheap loans and yet the big corporations and the big banks are not coming through for the American people.

Meanwhile, food prices continue to go up. According to the United Nations food agency, global food prices set another new all-time record during the month of January, and they are expected to continue rising for months to come.

That certainly is not going to ease tensions in the Middle East and elsewhere around the world. When people are not able to pay for the food that they need that tends to make them very, very angry.

For now we are not likely to see food riots in the United States, but as food prices rise all of those food stamp cards are not going to go as far as they used to. Average American families are going to feel more strain at the supermarket. There will be less money available for other things.

A key indicator to watch is the price of oil. The price of oil is one of the key components of the price of food, and if we see the price of oil go up to $120 or $150 a barrel that could mean really bad things for both the U.S. economy and the overall global economy.

If we do see another financial crisis like we did in 2008, is the U.S. government going to rush to bail out the big corporations and the big banks like they did the last time?

As we have seen from the numbers above, that certainly would not sit well with the American people.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: corporatesocialism; corporations; cronycapitalism; influence; size
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: SpaceBar

Correct!!!!!


21 posted on 02/04/2011 8:15:46 AM PST by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie; SeekAndFind
I have no objection to any non-state institution on the basis of size or influence, per se. I do object to any institution, whether corporation, labor union, government bureacracy, university, church, or other non-profit, which is run by people who use fiduciary positions for the benefit of their own wealth and power, rather than for the benefit of the shareholders, workers, citizens, faculty*, faithful, or intended beneficiaries of other sorts of non-profits.

The corrupt corporations Frantzie listed are among this sort of institution (as were Enron and Worldcom, not to mention SEIU, the UAW, most agencies of the Federal governement, Fannie and Freddie, the university I work at under its previous administration (not sure about the current one), many megachurchs (and, alas, one particular Orthodox jurisdiction with ties to the Middle East), and any non-profit whose CEO draws a high six-figure salary or more.

* Yes, faculty. A university is its faculty. Only part of its purpose is the education of students: the conduct of research and scholarship by the faculty has always been part of the raison d'etre for universities, and to reduce them to mere schools would be an impoverishment of Western Civilization.

22 posted on 02/04/2011 8:16:10 AM PST by The_Reader_David (And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kittymyrib

“..It can force you to sell your home, shut down your business...”

Big banks can do that as well. JP Morgan Chase is a good example. The Chase part is the Rockefellers.

The big banks also own the Fed - who can steal all of your wealth.


23 posted on 02/04/2011 8:16:41 AM PST by Frantzie (HD TV - Total Brain-washing now in High Def. 3-D Coming soon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Lessthantolerant
Number one on the list should be Monsanto. It's like the Corporate equivalent of George Soros.
24 posted on 02/04/2011 8:17:30 AM PST by liberalh8ter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

And anyone who thinks corporations can do no wrong has never heard of Interessen-Gemeinschaft Farbenindustrie AG.


25 posted on 02/04/2011 8:17:36 AM PST by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
"The problem is the line between corporations and governments gets more blurred by the day."

I agree with that. I would also add that great swaths of society, from the lowest consumer to the largest producer, have been willing to substitute the constraints of personal morality with the restraints of law and to equate the terms "ethical" with "legal".

When an influential bloc gets power over legislators and gets laws passed that favor them over others, they have no moral constraint preventing them from abusing that law to the detriment of those outside that bloc. This applies not only to crony capitalists, but to the affirmative action and blanket amnesty industries at all. It's a candle of abuse that burns at both ends.

26 posted on 02/04/2011 8:18:36 AM PST by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: liberalh8ter

Everyone should add to the list. I’d like to see who runs all the lobbying and pacs


27 posted on 02/04/2011 8:23:56 AM PST by Lessthantolerant (The State is diametrically opposed to our search for a better living.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper
I'm ok with corps, it's big government that I'm really, really done with.

I have found that many of the biggest corporations are also the biggest socialists. Profits are private and losses are society's

28 posted on 02/04/2011 8:24:27 AM PST by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
“Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power” - Benito Mussolini

Most corporate boards are populated by Globalists, extreme Leftists, big government Neo-cons, and foreigners. None of these people are loyal to America or to its founding principles and in many cases outright hostile to it. Every commercial you see on TV is some Corporation pushing environmentalism or diversity claptrap.

The last thing these Corporations want is true free enterprise. They want Big Daddy Government to constantly bail them out with taxpayer money or regulate their competition out business. This is exactly what that Communistic health care law written by the insurance corporations wrote known as Obamacare does.

"Competition is a sin" - John D. Rockefeller

29 posted on 02/04/2011 8:26:23 AM PST by Roninf5-1 (If ignorance is bliss why are so many Americans on anti-depressants?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Don’t like the power and influence of company X? Don’t buy their products.
Don’t like the consequences of your options? Life is tough; be happy it’s not a lot worse.


30 posted on 02/04/2011 8:31:59 AM PST by ctdonath2 (Great children's books - http://www.UsborneBooksGA.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Reader_David

Good point.


31 posted on 02/04/2011 8:39:03 AM PST by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2

excellent...spot on... Dennis Prager says it all the time, “I fear big government far more that big companies. Big government has the military and the force of law. They have the ability to put you in jail”.


32 posted on 02/04/2011 8:48:15 AM PST by Chuzzlewit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2

Among the corporations that need to be investigated for corruption, bribery of government officials, money laundering, insider trading, financial malfeasance and mismanagement are: GE, Goldman Sachs, GM, Chrysler, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Countrywide etc.


33 posted on 02/04/2011 8:48:23 AM PST by Ev Reeman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

Big business, big government, one in the same. They feed off each other. Its crony capitalism that runs our country now, true capitalism has been relegated to the small business arena.


34 posted on 02/04/2011 8:49:29 AM PST by WILLIALAL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

And 33% are unemployed.


35 posted on 02/04/2011 8:50:08 AM PST by ReverendJames (Only A Painter Or A Liberal Can Change Black To White)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Obviously the solution is to institute price controls and to dismantle all major corporations by seizing their assets and returning that money back to the government where it belongs.

Then, just to be on the safe side, we need to tax any income over $100K at 100% to make sure nobody can ever grow a large company again.


36 posted on 02/04/2011 8:50:57 AM PST by VeniVidiVici (Only two things come from Texas and I see you're wearing an "I Heart Austin" t-shirt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Roninf5-1
“Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power” - Benito Mussolini

Then no one should complain if our present government is called fascist.

37 posted on 02/04/2011 8:51:34 AM PST by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: WILLIALAL

” true capitalism has been relegated to the small business arena “

Given the way that small business is taxed and regulated to distraction, I’d be tempted to take your statement one step farther - ‘true capitalism has been relegated to the Underground Economy...’


38 posted on 02/04/2011 8:52:00 AM PST by Uncle Ike (Rope is cheap, and there are lots of trees...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

So you’re one of those...


39 posted on 02/04/2011 8:55:28 AM PST by Codeflier (Bush, Clinton, Bush, Obama - 4 democrat presidents in a row and counting...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Ev Reeman

So why do you do purchase their products/services?


40 posted on 02/04/2011 8:56:01 AM PST by ctdonath2 (Great children's books - http://www.UsborneBooksGA.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson