“It would be, if that statement were true, except that the statement is a lie, and as such doesn’t epitomize anything but a hysterical rant unsupported by fact.”
You seem to be the one ranting in this with accusations.
The fact does not lie there were blackouts of what most normal people would consider to certainly be within the most critical of places where ordered blackouts should not be made, i.e hospitals.
The other fact is that a game venue, that’s right a GAME venue, did not suffer a blackout.
If those facts don’t cause alarm in the immorality of this situation to you, you deserve to be back on your Gulag job.
You act like the hospital outages were intentional. If they were, you would have a point.
Since they weren’t, you come across as hysterical.
You stated, in your original comment with thie article: when ailing people in hospitals suffer in order to allow football venues to be unaffected.
The error in your statement was not in the two facts (ailing people in hospitals suffer, football venue unaffected), but in your unsupported linkage of the two: "in order to allow".
It would be as if you claimed that I was not eating a cookie, in order to allow me to post a reply to you.
I'm not eating a cookie because I don't have one. It has nothing to do with my posting to you. Likewise, the hospitals did not have power because the electric company screwed up. It had NOTHING to do with the stadium having power.
You claimed that the electric company cut off the hospitals in order to give power to the stadium. That is false.
Oh come on...We know these people are just superbowl bashers.....lol