[CharlesWayneCT]

You have mentioned two facts. I will give you two other facts. I am posting a reply. I am not eating a cookie.

You stated, in your original comment with thie article: when ailing people in hospitals suffer in order to allow football venues to be unaffected.

The error in your statement was not in the two facts (ailing people in hospitals suffer, football venue unaffected), but in your unsupported linkage of the two: "in order to allow".

It would be as if you claimed that I was not eating a cookie, in order to allow me to post a reply to you.

I'm not eating a cookie because I don't have one. It has nothing to do with my posting to you. Likewise, the hospitals did not have power because the electric company screwed up. It had NOTHING to do with the stadium having power.

You claimed that the electric company cut off the hospitals in order to give power to the stadium. That is false.

[bestintxas]

The words “in order to allow” could be mistakenly viewed, so if I replace these with the word “while”, this should pacify you.

BTW, by the same token, your last statement stating this a falsehood is not necessarily true either. I believe neither of us have that knowledge.

[dragnet2]

Likewise, the hospitals did not have power because the electric company screwed up.

Bookmark