The concept that the government could or should only allow certain people to have guns stands the very concept of American jurisprudence on its head. It presumes that the government knows all, controls all, and should be doing so. It is wrong and ineffective.
It is crazy to set up a huge expensive bureaucratic system, require everyone to jump though hoops and prove that they are *not* criminals in order to try, ineffectively, to prevent the few individuals who are not responsible, from having legal access to guns. This is a failed paradigm, and it should be abandoned. To accept the idea that the all gun sales should be monitored by the government, and only allowed to those it deems satisfactory is fundamentally wrong.
The entire idea of the enterprise has always been the death of a thousand cuts, where the restrictions on who can buy, and where, and how and what are continually increased until the number of gun owners is reduced to political insignificance.
So why isn't he in jail this week? They broke the law, the Mayor was the instigator behind it. I don't care what their motives were, the road to Hades is paved with... well, you get the point.
"We were only doing it to prove a point." is no excuse. Why not accept other noble motives? "I needed to protect my brother from ..." etc. etc.
Teach these {expletive} liberals that the law applies to everyone - including their elitist backsides.
We need not pay any more attention to him than it takes to scrape him off our shoes.
The clear message here is: gun control only keeps guns out of the hands of law abiding citizens.
At least they weren’t selling salt at the Gun Show.
He broke the law, matter of fact he did so conspiratorily. Indict, prosecute and incarcerate Bloomberg and whoever else was involved. Do your duty LEOs and DAs, get with it.
Probably from private sellers.
...but two gun vendors illegally sold guns to "buyers" who confessed that they probably wouldn't pass a background check.
Again, probably private sellers who at least asked the "buyers" a question or two.
I wonder how much this PR stunt cost the taxpayers of NY State?
Whenever a lefty begins their ‘emotionally appeal’ for sensible ‘gun control’, I quietly remind them that I,along with many others, can easily end their life with my bare hands.
I then ask them if there should be sensible ‘hand control’ laws???
If someone wants to end your life, they do not need a gun to do it.
The solution is to go to NYC and gather dirt and publish it in return.
I would speculate that in 5 days in NYC, buyers with money could easily purchase a most damning collection. Then to put it on YouTube for the world to see.
Obviously, everything that was collected would be encouraged by Bloomberg.
It’s all about banning private sales between two citizens, nothing more.
If memory serves, didn’t the BATF [wonder of wonders] ream Bloomturd out the last time he pulled this crap?
If it is a loophole, then it is not illegal. People use the word loophole constantly (and incorrectly) to define exemptions written into a law.
IMHO, if I were a gun show operator, I wouldn’t let private individuals set up tables to sell their private guns. These people give the whole gun show industry a bad name.
Also, it is my opinion that many of these individuals are actually unlicensed gun dealers breaking existing law. I have seen the same people year after year selling (and trading) their “personal” guns at my local gun show. At some point, you stop being just an individual selling his personal guns and become a gun dealer.
An individual has the absolute right to sell his private property, but it doesn’t have to happen at a gun show.
Just my 2 cents
I’ll admit I didn’t read the entire article. But did these undercovers buy from a private seller or a gun dealer?
If they bought from a private seller at the gun show, just like on the street or at a friends house, you are not required to do background checks on private sells. What’s the big deal here.
Bunch of jackwagons.
Technically, the title is too long. It should be:
“Arizona Contemptuous of Bloomberg”