Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: justlurking

Vinson did state that an injunction wasn’t necessary,
as the law was now void,
and he had the expectation that the Executive would comply with the law.

Now, who’s gonna enforce this compliance?


49 posted on 02/03/2011 7:11:37 AM PST by MrB (Tagline suspended for important announcement on my about page. Click my handle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: MrB
Now, who’s gonna enforce this compliance?

Therein lies the problem. Vinson expects that the Obama administration would comply with the law. But, without the injunction, there's no way to enforce compliance.

So, they are free to ignore him, with no consequences. Maybe he'll impose an injunction, then. But, given the rules of jurisdiction, the administration can simply avoid doing anything in the northern district of Florida, and there won't be a plaintiff that can show injury by non-compliance.

50 posted on 02/03/2011 7:22:14 AM PST by justlurking (The only remedy for a bad guy with a gun is a good WOMAN (Sgt. Kimberly Munley) with a gun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson