Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ErnstStavroBlofeld

This just in!

USAF finds out water is wet! (with the help of the Navy, which is now moving to the EA/18 platform)


2 posted on 02/01/2011 9:44:45 PM PST by freedumb2003 (The TOTUS-reader is a Judas Goat, leading the American sheeple to the slaugherhouse /Parmy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: freedumb2003

I don’t see including cost of training pilots or maintenance personnel as a smart idea. Not because they shouldn’t count, but because you would have to make very important assumptions about retention rates. The only thing predictable about retention rates is that the services will guess wrong on them every time. Give me a fuel, consumables, parts whole life cost for x number of hours. Something you can chew on a while.


5 posted on 02/01/2011 10:43:42 PM PST by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: freedumb2003
with the help of the Navy, which is now moving to the EA/18 platform

The Super Hornet program is a reverse example of the F-22 and probable costs of the F-35. With those two programs, as planned purchases have been cut, per aircraft costs have soared.

With the Super Hornet program, the addition of a dozen 4 plane squadrons drove down the per unit cost to the point where Super Hornets are now costing about $50-55 million a piece. Then the Aussies got some, then the Navy added some more.

F-35 per unit costs will continue to climb as more aircraft get cut from the buy.

7 posted on 02/01/2011 10:54:11 PM PST by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson