Replies

To: Defend Liberty; 21stCenturion; kevkrom; OldDeckHand

Defend Liberty (12/12/10 FR 'born on' date) ...

IMHO, you are either 1) a troll; 2) completely closed-minded to listening to another's point; or 3) just plain stubborn to a fault.

25 posted on 02/02/2011 10:45:04 AM PST by Servant of the Cross (I'm with Jim DeMint ... on the fringe!)

To: Servant of the Cross

"Original" does not mean "Exclusive". You're the one that claimed the Constitution states "exclusive" by how YOU interpret "original". Your definition of "original" is incorrect as illustrated by over 220 years of jurisprudence. This has been painstakingly explained to you multiple times now. Sheesh.

Exclusive jurisdiction is not mentioned in the Constitution. An act of Congress can not change the Constitution. If that were the case then Congress would be the final authority on the Constitution and therefore could change the Constitution at their whim and Article V regarding changing the Constitution through the Amendment process would be irrelevant. This has been explained to you several times. By your line of reasoning that means you are closed minded.

26 posted on 02/02/2011 11:03:23 AM PST by Defend Liberty

To: Defend Liberty; Servant of the Cross; kevkrom; OldDeckHand

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kQFKtI6gn9Y

DefLib’s dodgy tactics remind me SO MUCH of Monty Python’s Argument Clinic sketch ...

This is Futile !

One man’s Opinion

21stCenturion

28 posted on 02/02/2011 5:17:53 PM PST by 21stCenturion ("It's the Judges, Stupid !")

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794