Replies

"Original" does not mean "Exclusive". You're the one that claimed the Constitution states "exclusive" by how YOU interpret "original". Your definition of "original" is incorrect as illustrated by over 220 years of jurisprudence. This has been painstakingly explained to you multiple times now. Sheesh.

Exclusive jurisdiction is not mentioned in the Constitution. An act of Congress can not change the Constitution. If that were the case then Congress would be the final authority on the Constitution and therefore could change the Constitution at their whim and Article V regarding changing the Constitution through the Amendment process would be irrelevant. This has been explained to you several times. By your line of reasoning that means you are closed minded.