Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Servant of the Cross
"Original" does not mean "Exclusive". You're the one that claimed the Constitution states "exclusive" by how YOU interpret "original". Your definition of "original" is incorrect as illustrated by over 220 years of jurisprudence. This has been painstakingly explained to you multiple times now. Sheesh.

Exclusive jurisdiction is not mentioned in the Constitution. An act of Congress can not change the Constitution. If that were the case then Congress would be the final authority on the Constitution and therefore could change the Constitution at their whim and Article V regarding changing the Constitution through the Amendment process would be irrelevant. This has been explained to you several times. By your line of reasoning that means you are closed minded.
26 posted on 02/02/2011 11:03:23 AM PST by Defend Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: Defend Liberty

27 posted on 02/02/2011 11:08:40 AM PST by Servant of the Cross (I'm with Jim DeMint ... on the fringe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson