Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Marty62

They can’t keep preexisting-condition coverage without the individual mandate. Then everyone would wait until they need it to buy “insurance.” We will end up with single-payer or nothing, if SCOTUS goes along with this.


361 posted on 01/31/2011 5:38:04 PM PST by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: firebrand
“We will end up with single-payer or nothing, if SCOTUS goes along with this.”

Having nothing would be imminently better than Obamacare or single payer. There are so many better ways to deal with this. How about letting physicians come up with a plan? If the public doesn't like it, don't implement it. I guarantee the public will like a plan put together by physicians a lot better than a plan put together by the lawyers in Congress.

362 posted on 01/31/2011 5:54:05 PM PST by pieceofthepuzzle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 361 | View Replies ]

To: firebrand

I don’t like people with pre-existing conditions being denied coverage. BUT and it’s a big BUT. I’m not willing to shread the Constitution to get it. (I don’t have this problem)


370 posted on 01/31/2011 7:21:30 PM PST by Marty62 (Marty 60)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 361 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson