Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Free ThinkerNY

I think the “education” needs to go the other way.

For example, these are scientific observations:

* There is no such thing as “scientific consensus.”

* AGW does not rise to the level a of Scientific Theory. It is still in the H0 stage.

* Funding<>facts

* Faking data is never a good way to get scientific support

* The climatological models used by scientists who claim AGW have not passed standard double-blind evaluation. They have not even been submitted for them.

* All scientists do not get a say in the discussion. The number of real climatologists who disagree with AGW has long since passed the tipping point.

And those are just off the top of my head!


20 posted on 01/30/2011 5:05:21 PM PST by freedumb2003 (The TOTUS-reader is a Judas Goat, leading the American sheeple to the slaugherhouse /Parmy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: freedumb2003

Exactly!! But these Dems, as elitist and enlightened as they claim to be, are not about the environment, they could care less about it. ALL they care about is redistribution of wealth and using junk science to achieve that. Thing is, most of them are redistributing it to their own coffers, America loosing to China is just a nice nifty plus for them.


54 posted on 01/30/2011 7:35:33 PM PST by gidget7 ("When a man assumes a public trust, he should consider himself as public property." Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson