So did the Shah of Iran, so did Saddam Hussein in Iraq, so did Milosevic in Yugoslavia. You don't get it, the globalist bankers thrive on instability -- it's just another word for "opportunity" to them. You are under the assumption that "America's interests" is what guides these decision makers when it is the furthest thing from their minds.
It’s in NOBODY’s interest to have a more volatile Middle-East. Except the Muslims’.
Again, you assume that the bankers and Muslims are on opposite sides. Where have you been? The Muslims are due to be about 1/4 of the planet in the next 20 years. What a "market-share"!
“Again, you assume that the bankers and Muslims are on opposite sides. Where have you been? The Muslims are due to be about 1/4 of the planet in the next 20 years. What a “market-share”!”
True all the big global banks have been instituting Sharia Banking. The same banks that backed obama/acorn that we bailed out!
“Islamic Sharia banking is coming to the United States and other western nations, thanks to global banks such as Citigroup, HSBC, Deutsche Bank, Morgan Stanley, and Goldman Sachs.”
http://www.chronwatch-america.com/blogs/964/Sharia-Banking—The-Silent-Jihad-Against-the-West.html
Shariah Compliant Banks
http://www.shariahfinancewatch.org/blog/shariah-compliant-banks/
Oh boy.
If we’ve become so jaded as to think every national decision is made by a shadow government, we truly are lost.
“Globalist Bankers” like Soros may thrive on instability, and work actively to cause it, but the circles he runs in are pretty rarefied. Globalist Bankers didn’t cause this, and even if they did, who can predict who the financial winners and losers will be? It’s not like the Egyptian Pound is a hugely-traded international currency.
Yeah, Islam is growing faster than Christianity, by about a third of a percetage point...Christianity remains the world’s largest religion, and bonus for us — We don’t have a subsect we routine go out and try to kill! (At least with bombs - We’re pretty good at attacking and discrediting one another on dogmatic ground)
Occams Razor says the simplest explanation tends to be the legitimate one...Yeah, America has a track record of treating with despots and seeing them overthrown, but so did the Soviets...It is an occupational hazard as a superpower.
At the same time, it’s probably exactly what it looks like - A disenfranchised and resentful populace at the end of their rope and incited by the Muslim brotherhood to overthrow a tyrant who happened to be in bed with Uncle Sam. No Global Banker or Communist Underground connection needed, though really - Even if there is, it won’t change the outcome.