Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bvw

The courts won’t address the definition of NBC or the facts of Obama’s eligibility. So it doesn’t even matter what the people focus on or are distracted by. Before the election there was nothing we could do about it that we weren’t already trying to do.

Now before the 2012 election we can do a lot about it, in the form of state eligibility bills, and the state eligibility bills I know of almost all incorporate a definition of NBC that will force SCOTUS to define the term and require Obama and everybody else to be judged by that definition.

And in the long run, I think his refusal to do that mundane task that everybody else has to do - present documentation - has caused a LOT of the distrust of him, and especially as people see that he DOES seem to want to undo the Constitution.

People in government offices at both state and national levels have committed crimes to cover for Obama. That’s a very, very expensive diversion and people would not do that willingly just as a diversion. There’s more to the story than what we’re seeing; of that I am absolutely convinced.


198 posted on 01/27/2011 6:43:21 PM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies ]


To: butterdezillion
Like I've said before you are very smart.

I'm sticking with my description of the con. I'm glad you aren't up on con techniques, that's good. But for various reasons -- I am. What crystallized the two-step con for me were two recent things, one a recollection of a perfected con that cost a friend of mine -- who was used as the dupe in it -- his law license. The story of that con is retold here.

The sharpies in that one had a goal, but there was a legal impediment to that goal. They were missing one key piece. Or rather, that key piece was no going to allow the deal to go through. So they set up a distraction con. One that was risky, but they got away with it.

And then, in that same period of a few days, we have the clockers on the Obama team spinning up this new legend of "the father's foreign citizenship was never an issue before the election. Never. Period." They want to poison the issue of the father's foreign citizenship as a desperation toss, brought up too late, and that it's just racist reactionary desperation.

Why the new spin?

Simple, given the con model I proposed in the earlier post. The distraction part of the con is to keep the focus on where Obama was born!

250 posted on 01/28/2011 6:21:23 AM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson