Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: astyanax; Anitius Severinus Boethius
It was the courts that changed the original intent of the Amendment. A law is more than adequate to correct it.

Agreed.

Citizenship for the new born of illegal entrants was intitally based on a throw-away comment that appeared in a dissent (cite not at my fingertips).

Even the ambassador of Ireland was subject to the jurisdiction until the U.S. decided to grant him immunity. Obviously, everyone not specifically granted immunity is said to be subject to the jurisdiction. The most sensible interpretation is that "subject to the jurisdiction" did not mean subject to the obvious, but was clearly intended to mean subject to the "sole" jurisdiction.

Folks should not believe for a moment that illegal entrants are subject to the sole jusridiction of the U.S. If so, how is it the native country of an illegal entrant accepts them back when we deport them?

33 posted on 01/27/2011 12:03:56 PM PST by frog in a pot (We need a working definition of "domestic enemies" if the oath of office is to have meaning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: frog in a pot
Folks should not believe for a moment that illegal entrants are subject to the sole jusridiction of the U.S. If so, how is it the native country of an illegal entrant accepts them back when we deport them?

I agree. In fact, if illegal aliens are subject to the sole jurisdiction of the United States, how can our government legally deport them? Our government can't deport American citizens, as they are subject to the sole jurisdiction of the United States.

75 posted on 01/30/2011 12:59:20 AM PST by Isabel C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson