Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scrapping Nimrod is a gift horse for the Russians
The Daily Telegraph ^ | January 27th, 2011 | Con Coughlin

Posted on 01/27/2011 8:29:52 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki

Scrapping Nimrod is a gift horse for the Russians

By Con Coughlin

Last updated: January 27th, 2011

The commanders of Russia’s Baltic fleet will be rubbing their hands with glee over the government’s decision to scrap the RAF’s £4 billion Nimrod aircraft.

As I wrote this morning, for 40 years Nimrod has been central to our attempts to prevent Russia’s fleet of nuclear submarines from penetrating our defences.

But without the sophisticated maritime reconnaissance capability that Nimrod provides, we have, in effect, abandoned the North Sea to the Russians.

Defence officials insist that our Nato allies in Scandanavia, who also have a vested interest in keeping the Ruskies at bay, will be able to help us out by sharing the intelligence they collect from their own surveillance patrols.

This may well be true, but I suspect the quality of the information they provide will be inferior to that provided on a daily basis by the teams of RAF specialists who have honed their skills over many years of detecting and tracking Russian submarine movements.

I can see why the government felt it had no option other than to scrap the Nimrod programme. Once the Strategic Defence and Security Review had decided to stick with the new aircraft carriers, and that the Army must remain immune from wholesale cuts while it is still operational in Afghanistan, there were few other options left.

Nor did the RAF do itself any favours by presiding over a programme that was more than a decade behind schedule and massively over budget.

But the retired service chiefs who

(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.telegraph.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Russia; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: aerospace; froglips; navair; nimrod; nimrods; raf; russia; uk
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: Vaquero
though some modern Lutheran theologians reject the use of this term because of its ambiguity.

You didn't expect them to call it the Nimrod...the moron, did you? I think you are right about Bugs though.

21 posted on 01/27/2011 1:48:25 PM PST by xone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: xone

22 posted on 01/27/2011 2:21:11 PM PST by Vaquero ("an armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

So? We’ve gone from the PBY-5 “Cat” to the P-5M “Marlin” to the P-2 “Neptune” to the P-3 “Orion.” Now we are going to the P-8, the “Fighting Baggage Handler.”


23 posted on 01/27/2011 6:01:08 PM PST by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
Now we are going to the P-8, the “Fighting Baggage Handler.”

NOSE ART


24 posted on 01/28/2011 3:51:36 AM PST by Vaquero ("an armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: klpt

Got that right.


25 posted on 01/28/2011 6:38:11 AM PST by stuartcr (Everything happens as God wants it to...otherwise, things would be different)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson