Replies

So you are all for limited governing and individual liberty, the promotion of freedom and basic inalienable human rights unless, what? That individual is gay?

Perverts? Send them off to do our fiercest fighting?

Shame on you.

Actually it is an appropriate response given the misguided effort to keeping them off the front lines as some are suggesting...due to health concerns, blood, and % of AIDS/Hep rates among sodomites.
While it is reasonable and understandable that soldiers wouldn’t want to be exposed to the risk in battle situations, I think units composed strictly of infected blood carriers on the front line is far more reasonable than keeping them off the front line entirely.

I am completely against healthy straight fathers and potential family men(our countries future) fighting while sick sodomites come home untouched and protected from the battles our healthy young future risk their lives in....

I understand your sentiment, but place "shame" where it belongs. The U.S. military has one mission and one mission only : to be the most efficient and effective fighting force on the face of the Earth. When we battle, we win, period. Anything that advances that cause is welcome. Anything that detracts from it is unwelcome. The decision to introduce open homosexuality into the military body is rooted purely in social politics. The Pres__ent has politicized the safety and defense of the nation because a subset of liberals need to "feel good" about themselves --- and the effectiveness and efficiency of the military be damned for it. That kind of selfishness is "shameful". Who else with the need to feel good about themselves should we allow to cripple the fighting force? How about the morbidly obese? They too have special health considerations and require certain special accommodations made for them in order to serve. If the liberals decide the obese need to feel good about themselves and have access to military service, would it be wise for our Pres__ent to welcome them in too? Clearly not. I grant you that a healthy respect for the sanctity of life ought to be encouraged. But I include with that the sanctity of life for those capable servicemen put in harms way with crippled military capabilities covering their flanks? They are worth far more to us than the hurt feelings of minute portion of the citizenry.