BREAKING NEWS: Obama to call for 5-year freeze on non-security spending, White House says

MSNBC ^ | January 25, 2011 | MSNBC

[Buckeye Battle Cry]

It’s a CON! Just like the pay freezes in federal employees. The pay rates were frozen, but EVERYONE got merit/step increases into the next higher pay grade, so although they technically did not get “raises” their pay increased because they were re-classified into a higher grade where the “frozen pay rate” was above the “frozen pay grade” they were just promoted out of.

No matter how thin you slice it, it’s still baloney!

[onedoug]

This from the professional liar himself.

[montag813]

“Freeze” at the highest levels in history

[Stosh]

This @ssclown takes us for idiots.

If for two years I or my spouse run up our credit card debt by spending $1,000 a month more than we bring in, we don’t “freeze” our spending at a level that’s already been proven to be a disaster, we cut back until we actually start chewing into the accumulated debt. Or we figure out how to make a lot more money.

Obama is incapable of pursuing either approach.

[Major Matt Mason]

Sorry, but spending must be cut back to levels from earlier this decade, not frozen at the ridiculously high levels currently in place. The GOP's response must include a statement like this, and the GOP's mantra should be to cut, not freeze.

[Cementjungle]

This @ssclown takes us for idiots.

51% of the country ARE idiots... the Dem voters to be specific.

[kabar]

Usually these “freezes” mean nothing beyond inflationary increases. So the budget will contiue to grow along with the deficits.

[kabar]

Since the entitlement programs and debt servicing costs make up half of the budget and consume all of the tax revenue, this freeze on non-security funding is meaningless. Here is a video illustrating our problem.

Budget cuts

[sheana]

Food security
Healthcare security
House security
Heating and cooling security
etc.

[Trueblackman]

Other Breaking News: Kevin Martin says, “Yeah Right!”

[Ann Archy]

FREEZE HELL!! REDUCE....REDUCE....REDUCE!!!

[HiTech RedNeck]

My hackles rise at the idea of what Bummer would call “security.” More and more nanny state? Also spending “would not increase” compared to what, the stimu-porkathons of 2009-2010?

[palmer]

“We need to get serious about this. For too long both parties blah blah blag ... my predecessor... highest ever... “

[palmer]

Maybe he meant we are going to freeze our butts off in all this global warming...