Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ejdrapes; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; stephenjohnbanker; DoughtyOne; calcowgirl; Gilbo_3; NFHale; ..
RE :” I'd love to know what the Tea Party Express thinks Paul Ryan won't say that Michele Bachmann will?

Same thought. That will be the interesting part. I will decide if it was a good idea AFTER the speeches.

One side thought about Ryan unrelated to Bachmann. He is proposing changes to SS and medicare that while may be necessary, would be political suicide by Republicans if attempted alone without significant Democrat support.

One set of commentators on NBC/MSNBC are baiting Republicans to go after cutting entitlements first including libs Joe Scarbouro, Gregory and Matthews. The other group of MSNBC progressives Schultz, Maddow, Cenk Uygur are all beating the drum for seniors daily warning them that Republicans want to cut ‘their’ entitlements to pay for tax cuts for ‘the rich’. This is an obvious political trap. Obama has to need those reforms for them to happen.

Before you can change SS their must be a common understanding that much of it is being funded by the general treasury, more borrowed money.

27 posted on 01/25/2011 5:41:17 AM PST by sickoflibs ("It's not the taxes, the redistribution is the federal spending=tax delayed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: sickoflibs
Problem is Bachmann's speech will get all the attention, except maybe from Fox News and conservative blogs. But you know the MSM will focus on her, especially if Ryan gives a great response and Bachmann throws some red meat in hers to get Chris Matthews undies in a bunch. That's why I think dual speeches is not a good idea. Let Michele go on Fox or any of the networks after and comment on it. Then she can still get her message out, she can still speak for tea partiers but it won't be considered competing against Paul Ryan.
31 posted on 01/25/2011 5:47:27 AM PST by ejdrapes (Run Michele Run Sarah needs some competition)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: sickoflibs
a PBS blurb roundtable the other nite had the libtard actually stating that w/o the $$$Ttrillions in spending/'stimulus' that unemployment would be 13-14% vs the 10% that it is today...

and the usual crap that the states cant 'absorb' the reduced fed dollars and the police, fire, education etc will all be cut to compensate...

the 'right' guy didnt have much for answers except the obvious, that the states and the people therein must take responsibility and adjust...

that argument simply wont work in the entitlement age...we-R-screwed...

88 posted on 01/25/2011 7:02:54 AM PST by Gilbo_3 (Gov is not reason; not eloquent; its force.Like fire,a dangerous servant & master. George Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: sickoflibs; ejdrapes; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; DoughtyOne; calcowgirl; Gilbo_3; NFHale

” One set of commentators on NBC/MSNBC are baiting Republicans to go after cutting entitlements first including libs Joe Scarbouro, Gregory and Matthews. The other group of MSNBC progressives Schultz, Maddow, Cenk Uygur are all beating the drum for seniors daily warning them that Republicans want to cut ‘their’ entitlements to pay for tax cuts for ‘the rich’.”

And no doubt, the STUPID PARTY will make the SS repair pitch in 2012, just in time for Obama to grab another 4 years.


113 posted on 01/25/2011 3:30:10 PM PST by stephenjohnbanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson