wouldn’t you say that they were supporting the communist manifesto if they do say the Constitution is old fashioned, out of step etc?
I quoted the number 29 specifically because it was the most current to contemporary political events.
In 1963, we learned what the Communist goals were, or some of them.
50 years later, we hear Democrats doing something just like 29.
We can say “no wonder you don’t want to hear the Constitution read, you’re a communist”.
I think you might’ve thought I was asking a question.