Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Voodoo economics? Tote up the jobs from Obama's stimulus
Washington Examiner ^ | 1/23/11 | Editorial

Posted on 01/23/2011 9:12:10 AM PST by Nachum

Democrats have lambasted Republicans for years for believing in "Voodoo economics."

Well, the evidence is mounting that economic superstition is alive and well in the nation's political circles, though it has nothing to do with a fondness for tax cuts. It's instead the crazy belief that the government can spend its way to prosperity for the rest of us. Underscoring this conclusion, the Ways and Means Committee in the new GOP-majority House released a report titled "It's Official: On Unemployment and Jobs, Democrats' 2009 Stimulus Was a Huge Failure."

The Ways and Means report provides a number of striking reminders about the predictions the White House made in January 2009 while urging the passage of their $814 billion Keynesian spending bill. By January 2011, the stimulus bill was supposed to have lowered the unemployment rate to 7 percent. It now stands at 9.4 percent, and the report notes that "the unemployment rate would be 11.3 percent if it included all the 'invisible unemployed' -- American workers who have simply given up looking for work." The report also claimed that the stimulus would create 3.7 million jobs by now, for a total of 137.6 million jobs in the American economy. Currently, there are 130.7 million jobs. Since passage of the stimulus, 47 of the 50 states have lost jobs; overall, the private sector has seen 1.8 million jobs disappear.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: economics; jobs; obamunism; socialism; tote; voodoo

1 posted on 01/23/2011 9:12:16 AM PST by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Nachum

I prefer the term “Obamunism.”


2 posted on 01/23/2011 9:13:25 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Gee, had they listened to an economist who was a economist first, and a Democrat second...


3 posted on 01/23/2011 9:27:59 AM PST by Son House (Every Moment of Everyday, You Can Make A Difference! Teach Conservatism!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

The contrast;

Oct 2009 at a Press Conference following the Economic Forum with Pelosi, House Democratic Leaders, and Economists;
Former Federal Reserve Vice Chairman Alan Blinder
“...we’re looking at an absolutely horrendous long-term fiscal outlook...”

vs

12/16/2009 Wall St. Journal : The Case for Optimism on the Economy | Alan Blinder
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704869304574596121329841680.html
“Investment has three components: business investment, inventory stocking, and homebuilding.
Business investment remains 20% below its 2008 peak
While real GDP was falling 3.7%, payroll employment dropped 5%, devastating many American families.
The investment slingshot and the fiscal stimulus will both peter out in 2010. Consumer finances and confidence are shaky. Banks are still failing and commercial real estate is a mess. We cannot count on exports to pull us out of this slump. All true.”


4 posted on 01/23/2011 9:42:58 AM PST by Son House (Every Moment of Everyday, You Can Make A Difference! Teach Conservatism!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Son House
devastating many American families

But they got health care insurance reform, only to less be able to afford it, while the cost increase, thank a Democrat!
5 posted on 01/23/2011 9:46:24 AM PST by Son House (Every Moment of Everyday, You Can Make A Difference! Teach Conservatism!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

It can’t be true. I heard Dick Durbin say this morning on Fox that they created over a million jobs last year! /s


6 posted on 01/23/2011 3:07:00 PM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Son House

Looks like Alan Blinder was the only economic without “blinders” on regarding the state of the economy.

No wonder he no longer works for the Great One.


7 posted on 01/23/2011 7:07:09 PM PST by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Son House

Looks like Alan Blinder was the only economist without “blinders” on regarding the state of the economy.

No wonder he no longer works for the Great One.


8 posted on 01/23/2011 7:07:20 PM PST by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

“It’s instead the crazy belief that the government can spend its way to prosperity for the rest of us.”

Yah, yah, the Ghosts Keynesian Past...tell us something we don’t know.


9 posted on 01/23/2011 7:09:22 PM PST by Fitzy_888 ("ownership society")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

I prefer the term “Obamunism.”

Indeed. But I’ve come to spell it “Obammunism”. You know, two “m”s, like in Communism.


10 posted on 01/24/2011 6:51:46 AM PST by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Made from the right stuff!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Son House

Gee, had they listened to an economist who was a economist first, and a Democrat second...

Uh, yeah. I mean, after all, Obama fired everyone of his administration that promoted the failed Keynesian stimulus, and the voters fired quite a few of Congress who voted for it.

While the voters really meant their firings, of course Obama was just trying to manufacture some scapegoats with his firings, because Porkulous was just a big political payback and a big part of the redistribution he wanted all along. After all, the WSJ is saying Obama will be calling for, guess what, MORE government spending tomorrow in his SOTU speech. But, gee, why am I not surprised. As I vaguely seem to recall, Obama’s answer to all economic woes is to:

1. Spend more.

2. Tax more.

3. Regulate more.

And then he pretends to wonder why things aren’t getting better. But hey, everyone, that’s Obammunism for you in a nutshell!


11 posted on 01/24/2011 6:59:37 AM PST by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Made from the right stuff!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Son House

http://www.economictheories.org/2008/08/effect-of-changes-in-money.html


12 posted on 01/24/2011 8:04:58 AM PST by griswold3 (We defend conservatism by our very way of life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
What do you expect from a Keynesian Kenyan?
13 posted on 01/24/2011 10:11:40 AM PST by Gabrial (The Whitehouse Nightmare will continue as long as the Nightmare is in the Whitehouse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson