Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Defend Liberty

No kidding. Or that somebody wouldn’t have told him a month so ago.


26 posted on 01/22/2011 5:16:36 AM PST by Wiser now (Happiness is not an absence of problems, but the ability to deal with them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: Wiser now

They all know that the BC, if there is one as Fukino said, not only can be disclosed but UIPA says it MUST be disclosed now that Fukino made a public announcement about what is on it.

That’s why Abercrombie brought the whole thing up. He knows he can (and should) disclose it, and he intended to disclose a forgery. It was only when he realized that a state could require the TRANSACTION LOGS for a BC to be disclosed (which would reveal a forgery and/or tampering) that he got cold feet and went hiding behind the same fake excuse that Fukino used.

But he didn’t go running for cover until AFTER he had said that they had to look in the ARCHIVES to find something written for Obama - which, if true, contradicts what Fukino said because a BC would not be in the archives. What Abercrombie said contradicts the whole story line thus far and prompts questions as to who is lying - Abercrombie, or Fukino?

This was clearly NOT an attempt to frame “birthers” as they buy into a “there isn’t a BC” head fake. This was an attempt by Obama’s handlers to prepare the country for Abercrombie to unveil Obama’s BC - a forgery. Unless we pass state laws requiring birth and/or citizenship records AND the transaction logs for those records, the Soros machine could legally “get away” with a forgery. But with the possibility of state laws being passed requiring the transaction logs, Abercrombie realized he could very easily be sitting in jail if he presented a forgery.

In his interview last Friday, Abercrombie was clearly talking about the political ramifications of a BC not being disclosed, realizing that states may require a BC for placement on their ballot. Abercrombie’s effort - by his own admission - was meant to address the potential eligibility bills on the horizon. That was his self-admitted focus.

And when he got to looking at what bills could be introduced and passed, he decided he better back down pronto. Because a state could require the transaction logs which would reveal the forgery he and Obama’s handlers had planned to use.


63 posted on 01/22/2011 7:04:29 AM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson