Posted on 01/20/2011 4:35:14 PM PST by mandaladon
Via Philip Klein, I cant decide whether shes serious or whether this is part of the Democrats new kitchen-sink approach to messaging about ObamaCare. She might be calculating that even an argument as inane as this one is worth making in order to counter the GOPs claims that O-Care is unconstitutional. If youre battling over public opinion, why not frame the other sides actions as being as illegitimate as your own? So on the one hand, maybe she doesnt really buy this and is simply engaged in a shrewd bit of PR. On the other hand dude. Thus do nine-month-old legislatively-granted entitlements, some of which havent even taken effect yet, become rights. If you take this idea seriously, then meaningful reform of Social Security and Medicare (which Lee presumably would describe as property for Due Process purposes) would require constitutional amendments, which in turn would utterly paralyze a process thats already close to total paralysis. Or have I misunderstood? If shes suggesting that some lesser process is due than a full Article V amendment, then, er, shouldnt a repeal bill duly enacted by Congress suffice? Or is the argument here that people with preexisting conditions, say, have always had a right to coverage under the Constitution and only lately have we progressed to the point where were willing to recognize that right? In that case, whyd they have to pass a bill last year? Patients should have simply sued and let the courts find a right to coverage in the penumbras of the Commerce Clause or whatever.
(Excerpt) Read more at hotair.com ...
You laugh, but she and he are the right color, and you are the wrong color, and you will find that out if you go looking for a job.
Those braids are what is known as The Crown Weave, and intentionally or not hearken back to when she said “I Am A Queen And I Demand To Be Treated Like One.”
Hint...her constituents are every bit as smart as she is!
LOL!
Well, actual monarchs or royalty are raised/trained for the duties and responsibilities of the position. That includes learning things such as courtesy, proper comportment and protocol of which Ms. Lee is seriously ignorant.
I thought Lynn Woolsey was stupid.
Voted YES on expanding research to more embryonic stem cell lines. (Jan 2007)
Voted YES on allowing human embryonic stem cell research. (May 2005)
Voted NO on restricting interstate transport of minors to get abortions. (Apr 2005)
Voted NO on making it a crime to harm a fetus during another crime. (Feb 2004)
Voted NO on banning partial-birth abortion except to save mothers life. (Oct 2003)
Voted NO on forbidding human cloning for reproduction & medical research. (Feb 2003)
Voted NO on funding for health providers who don't provide abortion info. (Sep 2002)
Voted NO on banning Family Planning funding in US aid abroad. (May 2001)
Voted NO on federal crime to harm fetus while committing other crimes. (Apr 2001)
Voted NO on banning partial-birth abortions. (Apr 2000)
Voted NO on barring transporting minors to get an abortion. (Jun 1999)
Endorsed Recommended by EMILY's List of pro-choice women. (Apr 2001)
Rated 100% by NARAL, indicating a pro-choice voting record. (Dec 2003)
Expand contraceptive services for low-income women. (May 2006)
Emergency "contraception" for rape victims at all hospitals. (Sep 2006)
Rated 0% by the NRLC, indicating a pro-choice stance. (Dec 2006)
Ensure access to and funding for "contraception". (Feb 2007)
Focus on preventing pregnancy, plus "emergency contraception." (Jan 2009)
Supported funding contraception and UN family planning. (Jul 1999)
Yet another communist hypocritical moron.
Yet she keeps getting elected. No wonder they think Americans are all Homer Simpsons.
Oh, I could tell you a story of how Queen Shelia “michelled” the queen of Thailand long before anyone knew who queen moochel was. The Royal Family of Thailand have a long interest in science and health, for the good of their people. The Queen of Thailand was in Houston and was at a luncheon in her honor.
Shelia was invited. She was an hour late, and she showed up with a camera crew. The queen was seated on a dais, as no one is supposed to sit at the same level as the queen. Queen Shelia charged right up onto the dais and then put her hands all over the real Queen and got in her face.
The Ruchirawat family are among the most gracious and pleasant people in the world, and the Queen smiled and accepted the insults without any indication that she had been insulted. Her staff, though, and her subjects in attendance, who choose to kneel or protrate themselves before the King and Queen, out of love, not out of law, did not appreciate it at all.
Sounds like you are from her area.
Tell me, do you think she’s really dumb or does she just play dumb?
I mean, a BA from Yale and a JD from U of Virginia? That was before AA really took hold. So I have to wonder-—is she putting on some kind of act to try to fit in with the peasants?
...I Am A Queen And I Demand To Be Treated Like One.
???
Wow...it’s hard to believe that she used to be a man!
She is perfectly representative of her constituency...
__________________________
I’m suprised that Houston is this nuts
Houston is chock full o' New Orleans pond scum since Katrina, don't forget. They never left the warm, pleasant free lunch in Houston to return to their native wet, unpleasant free lunch in Chocolate City.
” the Heights”
100% homosexual.
According to which Constitution? The Martian one?
She’s insane. She represents the Houston area of Texas. That’s somehow fitting.
Did Cavuto actually tell her “YOU’RE MAKING THINGS UP!”
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!
That man’s got cajones, that’s all there is to it! ;-)
>Is it really unconstitutional to repeal a bill thats unconstitutional? Im confused.<
maybe it is that double negative rule or something?
Her verbiage is clearly unconstipational..
She’s beyond the valley of the super stupid
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.