Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: markomalley
This act was specifically for those who had served the country in a military fashion and in no way resembles Obamacare for any and every citizen.
2 posted on 01/20/2011 12:41:54 PM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: mnehring

So what it really justifies is the existence of Walter Reed Military Hospital.

Gee, I wonder if that’s controversial..?


3 posted on 01/20/2011 12:45:32 PM PST by BelegStrongbow (St. Joseph, patron of fathers, pray for us!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: mnehring
These were not military hospitals. They were meant for the merchant mariners who hired on to cargo ships and whalers. These hospitals were the forerunner of the he US Public Health Service. We can recognoze this by the naval type uniforms worh by the Surgeon General and USPHS doctors when working.

The similarity to the mandate is superficial. Think of it like charging a fee for using a national park. Any sailor who didn't wish to pay could leave his job, once ashore. There were opportunities to sign on with foreign flag vessels or leave the profession.

The govt's idea was to attract and keep as many able seamen as possible for the Republic's commerical wellbeing.Hospital care was beyond the reach of most in the early 19th century, and giving those in a dangerous but vital occupation a chance at obtaining itat reasonable expense was in the national interest of the Republic.

14 posted on 01/20/2011 1:01:55 PM PST by xkaydet65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson