“Birthers insist Obama, born in 1961, is not eligible to be commander in chief.”
Not true, Daily Mail.
We’re like the cop who stops a car driving erratically on a highway used by drug mules and asks the driver if he will show us his driver’s license and registration, or even consent to a look in his car trunk.
We’re not saying he has bodies, drugs or bootleg smokes/liquor in his trunk. We’re just saying he’s shady as hell, and exigent circumstances or an order from a court, and the guy would have to comply.
We’re saying he’s hiding something, but we don’t know what it is and the reason that we’re like bulldogs on his t-bone is because we can’t stand him and want him removed or prevented from running again, if he’s violating the document he swore to defend. Btw, `We’ is me and the cricket in my shoe.
No, we are infact saying he is inelgible-long held and well proven laws of citizenship and heredity clearly indicate teh issue, as does our own founding documents’ declaration for eleigiblity.
One’s father delineates nationality and loyalty, so in Obamas case, with his father’s nationality not in question (no one will ever state he (Obama Sr.) was a US citizen) there is no basis to deny the fact that Obama is NOT a natural born US citzen-maybe born in the US, indeed a US citzen perhaps, but like so many others born to a non-US father, they indeed are also ineligible fot high office....
Best;
Keep your dog quiet, and get back those overdue books and tapes ...NOW.
Well said....