Skip to comments.
Arianna To Lieberman: 'For Sake Of Country, Hope You Don't Become Secretary Of Defense'
NewsBusters ^
| Mark Finkelstein
Posted on 01/20/2011 5:08:50 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest
Say this for Arianna Huffington: she didn't stab Joe Lieberman in the back. On Morning Joe today, the HuffPo founder went for the full frontal assault, telling the outgoing senator to his face "I sincerely hope for the sake of the country that you do not become Secretary of Defense."
Lieberman was not defenseless, at one point condescendingly spelling out for Arianna's sake the name of the author of a report he relied on to conclude Saddam was developing WMD. When Arianna huffed that there was nothing in the report that proves anything, Lieberman sniped "I don't think you've read it, sweetheart."
View video of the dust-up here.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: ariannahuffington; joelieberman; morningjoe; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
To: netmilsmom; Behind Liberal Lines; Miss Marple; an amused spectator; Diogenesis; MEG33; PGalt; ...
Arianna-Lieberman dust-up! Ping to Today show list.
To: governsleastgovernsbest
When he’s right, I like him - he wiped that smirk of Arianna’s face! That must have hurt!
Heh
3
posted on
01/20/2011 5:10:29 AM PST
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Arianna, since when do YOU give a damn about “the sake of our country”?
4
posted on
01/20/2011 5:10:42 AM PST
by
G Larry
To: G Larry
To: governsleastgovernsbest
“Sweetheart”? If he worked for ESPN he’d be fired.
6
posted on
01/20/2011 5:15:05 AM PST
by
John W
(Natural-born US citizen since 1955)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
The same Arianna that turned on a dime from being a Republican, to transform into a leftist moonbat?
To: governsleastgovernsbest
So let's see, Arianna Huffington, gold digger. Former Republican. Married a man known to be gay but she needed the name, the money, the connections, the fame and went ahead and did it anyway. Once he divorced her moussaka behind, she turned all bitter because her fellow Republican friends didn't support her the way she felt she needed the support.
She truly gives the term "a woman scorned" a new meaning and takes it to new heights!
To: governsleastgovernsbest
There’s NOTHING in her head, so I’d call it even!
To: Allthegoodusernamesaregone
She is not aging well, either. Freaking scank.
To: Flavious_Maximus
Her aging not so well is the least of my concerns. What is quite telling about her true character is the ease with which she switched sides so easy which points out to her lack of intellectual and ideological honesty. One simply doesn’t go from the right all the way to the left, as she did, unless she was never strong on her beliefs to begin with and they were all an act from the get go. Which means she was never a true Republican, she just rode on the wagon for as long as it benefited her, as many others do, on both sides of the isle.
To: Allthegoodusernamesaregone
Her aging not so well is the least of my concerns. What is quite telling about her true character is the ease with which she switched sides so easy which points out to her lack of intellectual and ideological honesty. $ORO$
12
posted on
01/20/2011 5:40:56 AM PST
by
SeeSac
To: governsleastgovernsbest
For morons like Huffington the perfect Sec. of Defense would be either (1) a “peace studies” professor from Berkeley or (2) whoever is in charge at Code Pink.
To: governsleastgovernsbest
... a report he relied on to conclude Saddam was developing WMD. Didn't need a report to conclude Saddam was developing WMD - he proved he had them - he used them.
14
posted on
01/20/2011 5:52:44 AM PST
by
DuncanWaring
(The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
To: windsorknot
The same Arianna that turned on a dime from being a Republican, to transform into a leftist moonbat? One and the same. She decided there were more dollars and cocktail party to be had by selling her soul.
15
posted on
01/20/2011 6:03:48 AM PST
by
ScottinVA
(The West needs to act NOW to aggressively treat its metastasizing islaminoma!)
To: DuncanWaring
Didn't need a report to conclude Saddam was developing WMD - he proved he had them - he used them. The official reason he was hanged, if I'm not mistaken.
16
posted on
01/20/2011 6:04:28 AM PST
by
Graybeard58
(Don't tell Obama what comes after a trillion)
To: ScottinVA
cocktail party = cocktail party invitations
17
posted on
01/20/2011 6:05:02 AM PST
by
ScottinVA
(The West needs to act NOW to aggressively treat its metastasizing islaminoma!)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
One thing that seems to be lost on critics of the Iraq war. Even though no WMDs of Saddam’s were found, Operation Iraqi Freedom directly resulted in Moammar Khadafy surrendering HIS not-so-insignificant stockpile. Khadafy admitted he feared he was next up on the list.
18
posted on
01/20/2011 6:07:38 AM PST
by
ScottinVA
(The West needs to act NOW to aggressively treat its metastasizing islaminoma!)
To: DuncanWaring
I liked when Liberals used to say (essentially) “Saddam doesn’t have WMD, and we’re the ones who sold them to him!”
19
posted on
01/20/2011 6:09:10 AM PST
by
A_perfect_lady
(Islam is as Islam does.)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
For the sake of our country, I wish she would go back to her own!
20
posted on
01/20/2011 6:11:27 AM PST
by
lonestar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson