Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: butterdezillion

Anyone here from Missouri? I sent the following email to my State Senator. You may want to do the same. Or send this to your Missouri friends and relatives. I’m still waiting for a reply…………

I looked at the Missouri 2008 Elected Officials Qualifications.
http://www.sos.mo.gov/elections/2008primary/2008offices.asp
It lists the qualifications for U.S. Representative through Township or Ward Committeemen and Committeewomen.

ALL Elected Officials had to meet certain qualifications EXCEPT for PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES. Isn’t it is puzzling why 2008 presidential candidates in Missouri were not required to meet eligibility qualifications, as stated in the U. S. Constitution?

“No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty-five years, and been fourteen years a resident within the United States”.

It seems logical that the Missouri 2012 election qualifications should require that all presidential candidates provide proof to the Secretary of State that they are at least 35 years old , a resident within the U.S. for fourteen years and that they were born in the U.S.

Most people assume that Barack Obama had been vetted before he was able to run for President. Guess what?
A congressional document posted on the Internet confirms no one – not Congress, not the states and not election officials – bothered to check Barack Obama’s eligibility to be president, and that status remains undocumented to this day.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/41131059/CRS-Congressional-Internal-Memo-What-to-Tell-Your-Constituents-Regarding-Obama-Eligibility-Questions

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=225561

And since the Federal government failed to vet Obama, maybe the states should do the government’s job for them.


16 posted on 01/19/2011 8:18:43 PM PST by Jonah Vark (Any 5th grader knows that the Constitution declares the separation of powers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Jonah Vark

The states choose the electors so they do have the responsibility to make sure their electors know who they can Constitutionally vote for.

In Nebraska we say they can vote for anybody who has the OK from the DNC or RNC. But Pelosi almost certainly perjured herself by saying that Obama was eligible when she had not checked the documentation and the Hawaii Democratic Party had indicated there could be a problem, by refusing to certify his eligibility as they had always done in the past.

The political parties cannot be trusted to obey the law. We’ve seen the lawlessness in the way the politicians behave and legislate, and now we’ve seen that it includes committing perjury since they know no state is going to even check out whether they perjured themselves.

The states need to realize that the DNC has perpetrated election fraud on them and they need to protect themselves from this ever happening again.

Democrats who balk at this need to be reminded that the RNC could just as easily perpetrate fraud as well, so the states need to have a way to do their OWN checking, and not rely on partisan statements for which there is no mechanism for legal accountability.

And for the states to do that they need to know the criteria they are checking for - which is something only the judiciary can determine, because it depends on the interpretation of the US Constitution.


20 posted on 01/20/2011 6:50:35 AM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson