This is a ridiculous justification. No. 3 is an abstract of No. 2. It’s not a separate record. Both have equal legal weight as prima facie evidence. No. 1 doesn’t include a place of birth, so this could NOT be one of the alleged ‘records’ that Fukino was referring to. Sorry, but this is a massive, ridiculous fail.
Maybe this will help: “There have been numerous requests for Sen. Barack Hussein Obamas official birth certificate. State law (Hawaii Revised Statutes §338-18) prohibits the release of a certified birth certificate to persons who do not have a tangible interest in the vital record.
Therefore, I as Director of Health for the State of Hawaii, along with the Registrar of Vital Statistics who has statutory authority to oversee and maintain these type of vital records, have personally seen and verified that the Hawaii State Department of Health has Sen. Obamas original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures.
No state official, including Governor Linda Lingle, has ever instructed that this vital record be handled in a manner different from any other vital record in the possession of the State of Hawaii.
—October 28, 2008
http://hawaii.gov/health/about/pr/2008/08-93.pdf
Maybe this will help:Ummm, do you not understand that Governor Abercrombie cannot find this alleged 'original birth certificate'?? How is this statement supposed to help?? If anything, it reveals that Fukino may have been lying outright and that there are no other records on file.
...have personally seen and verified that the Hawaii State Department of Health has Sen. Obamas original birth certificate on record...
This doesn't sound like an original birth certificate to me:
It was actually written I am told, this is what our investigation is showing, it actually exists in the archives, written down ...
but 0bama wrote in his book that he had a copy of one. Why doesn't he just share it, instead of creating a forged short form?