lol.
This guy is scared spitless that a state will pass a law like the one I’ve suggested.
I wonder how much of Obama’s billion-dollar re-election funding is designated for fighting lawsuits.
If a bill like the one I’ve suggested gets passed he will have to start early to spend that much money, because the suits need to be resolved before his name could be placed on the ballot. It’s he who would be under the time constraint; he who would have to prove his eligibility by the deadline rather than somebody else disproving his eligibility.
This article should be sent to state reps who want to see Obama gone after 2012. Hawaii has next to zilch.
I think the bigger concern in Hawaii has to be their presidential ballot law. In 2012, any concerned citizen can object to the finding of Obama being eligible to be listed on the presidential ballot, forcing the elections clerk to hold a hearing to explain how Obama was found to be eligible. At this point, there is an established direct and tangible interest in obtaining either the original birth certificate or an official verification form from the DOH. Refusal would create legal standing to sue and be heard in court. Abercrombie probably wants to run a pre-emptive end around before this can happen.