Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

United We Sit
American Spectator ^ | 1/17/11 | Ross Kaminsky

Posted on 01/17/2011 3:27:16 AM PST by markomalley

Colorado Democrat Senator Mark Udall has put forward the oh-so-Boulder idea that politicians of both parties should intermingle for their State of the Union address seating on January 25th. Udall, and his letter's cosigners suggest that "partisan seating arrangements at State of the Union addresses serve to symbolize division instead of the common challenges we face in securing a strong future for the United States" and further that "the choreographed standing and clapping of one side of the room -- while the other side sits -- is unbecoming of a serious institution."

Senate cosigners include touchy-feely and "red state" Democrats and the usual list of "bipartisan" RINOs (including notably John McCain): Mark Udall, Lisa Murkowski, Kelly Ayotte, Mark Begich, Barbara Boxer, Ben Cardin, Susan Collins, Kirsten Gillibrand, Amy Klobuchar, Mary Landrieu, Joseph Lieberman, Joe Manchin, John McCain, Claire McCaskill, Jeff Merkley, Ben Nelson, Jack Reed, Jeanne Shaheen, Olympia Snowe, Sheldon Whitehouse, and Ron Wyden. There is also a handful of House cosigners.

(Excerpt) Read more at spectator.org ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: sotu; stfu
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: markomalley

There are real differences of beliefs and philosophy. Should we have a touchy-feely embrace with DU? It sounds ridiculous.

But then our congresscritters rush to embrace the fad of the month. Let’s hope they think better of it.


21 posted on 01/17/2011 5:50:55 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

We do not want to work together, we want to defeat them. If they want to compromise their commie beliefs fine, we do not compromise our freedom.

Pray for the Tea Party Congress


22 posted on 01/17/2011 5:51:42 AM PST by bray (Support Palin to make heads explode on both sides,is that Blood Libel?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sten

They don’t want the public to be able to tell that the Democrats are standing and the Republicans are not when they fawn over the phrases of there great one. Although this is a constitutional requirement it is in reality a fever of egomania. Watch all the sucking up when the great one struts is like an emperor and the pandering applause, and the bravo sierra gets knee deep.


23 posted on 01/17/2011 6:05:16 AM PST by Harley45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
Not only is this a visual cover for the losses of the Democrats in the last election, I think the Democrats hope they can shame the Republicans into standing up and clapping for everything Obama says. It will give the TV elite some pictures of the stodgy Republicans sitting while all around them people are applauding the President.
24 posted on 01/17/2011 6:06:39 AM PST by wbarmy (I chose to be a sheepdog once I saw what happens to the sheep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

I dont care where anyone sits. I care about the legislation these people pass.


25 posted on 01/17/2011 7:54:36 AM PST by freespirited (Truth is the new hate speech. -- Pamela Geller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson