Posted on 01/16/2011 5:24:10 PM PST by Winged Hussar
National Jewish Democratic Council previously enabled MoveOn.org-hosted anti-Semitic blood libel
It comes as no surprise that the National "Jewish" "Democratic" Council has prostituted its purportedly Jewish identity to attack Sarah Palin for entirely partisan purposes, and that David A. Harris' lack of integrity is matched only by that of former NJDC leader Ira Forman. We remind our readers that Forman used NJDC's nominally Jewish identity to whitewash MoveOn.org's sponsorship of the most vicious imaginable hate speech against Jews and others, much as Jewish kapos (concentration camp trustees) of the Second World War told other Jews that the cattle cars were going to take them to nice country resorts instead of concentration camps. The difference is that the kapos, unlike Forman, often had guns to their heads (literally) and would have been killed had they not cooperated with vicious anti-Semites. Forman's NJDC cooperated with them entirely of its own volition.
...The hateful rhetoric began when Palin was blood libeled with the false accusation that she had somehow incited a deranged individual to commit a mindless act of violence, much as Jews were once falsely accused of using the blood of Christian babies to make matzos.
(Excerpt) Read more at israpundit.com ...
Pffttt!
About as “Jewish” as Obammy.
They've got to trash her for their DNC massas.
Wah!
Not very civil if you aks me.
Democrats need to take a careful look at their own worldview.
Although Loughner’s decisions are ultimately his own and only he is accountable for them, his horrible actions can be linked to the influence of leftist ideology.
Progressivism widely teaches that human life has no intrinsic value. Furthermore, through liberal sentencing of convicted criminals it teaches that committing horrible crimes such as killing other people will likely bring minimal consequences. In this way, liberalism encourages the sociopath to kill.
Progressivism is founded on the absurd belief that certain people can be given the power to give and to take away the rights of other people. This principle confirms particularly to the sociopath that he is morally free to kill other people as he chooses.
Perhaps most significant is the fact that the leftist worldview is by nature incoherent, a condition resulting from the chaos of relativism.
Relativism, the bedrock of progressive ideology, asserts there is no ultimate truth, allowing leftists to engage in their common practice of asserting one thing today and then completely contradicting themselves tomorrow. (Like schizophrenics do—and it is the basis for the democrats ignoring the violence in their own rhetoric.) Take it a step further and you have insanity, then chaos and destruction.
An honest assessment of the facts tells us Loughner merely followed progressive ideology to its ultimate conclusion.
There must be an organization called something like The Council of Coming Up With Names to Call Soros's Front Groups.
I mean, c'mon, he can't think of these names all by himself can he?
We protest this protest. We want Sarah Palin as the next president and call for round the clock protests of the National "Jewish" Democratic Counsil.
JWTGSIABA.... "Jews Who Think George Soros Is A Big Assh*le" is accepting applications for our new ping list. We will forward our petition for round the clock protests of this group and also call for 24/7 Glenn Beck programming.
Barack Obama received 78 percent of the Jewish vote, which is about 25 percent greater than Obama’s percentage of total support nationally.
Obama’s 78 percent of the Jewish vote comes surprisingly close to Al Gore’s 79 percent of the Jewish vote in 2000, when Gore ran with a Jewish vice presidential nominee.
http://punditarian.blogspot.com/2009/01/why-did-jews-vote-for-obama.html 
I used to work with a Jewish woman who went ballistic when I said that what the Turks did to the Armenians was genocide and a holocaust; she said there was only one holocaust in history, and that it was what the Nazis did to the European Jews; she said the Armenian slaughter wasn’t even genocide. When I asked her what it was, she said it was persecution. However, I know Jews who did say the Armenian atrocity was both genocide and a holocaust.
One group cannot claim copyright of events that have also happened to other groups.
What’s the difference between (1) being falsely accused of using blood in religious rituals and (2) being falsely accused of being responsible for a bloody massacre?
Before Palin used the phrase, 'blood libel', it was used in an article in either the NYSlimes or WaCompost by someone...
Help!
If it isn’t blood libel, what is it?
ya....the same “Jewish” group that doesn’t give a damn about Israel.
Blood Libel was a perfect and legitimate description. She should not back down! They don’t own the language!
“I used to work with a Jewish woman who went ballistic when I said that what the Turks did to the Armenians was genocide and a holocaust; she said there was only one holocaust in history, and that it was what the Nazis did to the European Jews; she said the Armenian slaughter wasn’t even genocide. When I asked her what it was, she said it was persecution. However, I know Jews who did say the Armenian atrocity was both genocide and a holocaust.”
The Anti-Defamation League’s (I began to call it the Antisemitism enabling and Denial League after its whitewash of MoveOn.org’s sponsorship of anti-Semitic and other hate speech) Abraham Foxman did his best to go along with Hitler’s statement “Who remembers the extermination of the Armenians” by lobbying against a Congressional recognition of the Armenian genocide.
Most (99.999%) Jews, however, recognize the Armenian genocide as exactly that. Most people also know that Hitler cited the world’s relative ignorance of this genocide when he said he could get away with killing all the Poles (and by implication all the Jews).
It was Glenn Reynolds in The Wall Street Journal—I believe last Sunday’s edition.
Does someone have a copyright on this term “blood libel?”
Kinda late to the party, you’d think offended people would be more promptly offended.
Is anyone, as yet, un-offended whom might be offended?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.