Posted on 01/16/2011 8:39:15 AM PST by Kaslin
When he unveiled his budget, the California governor boasted that he was delivering a spending plan without "gimmicks, tricks and unrealistic expectations."
On the one hand, Brown presented some bold changes in his spending plan by proposing a realignment of state and local government. Also, Brown has ordered some small but symbolically important cuts, such as slashing his own office's budget and halving the number of state employee cell phones.
On the other hand, it's hard to understand how Brown expects to pull off the linchpin of his spending plan -- an extension of tax increases enacted in 2009. Brown is asking the Legislature to put a special-election ballot measure before voters in June that would resume increases in personal income taxes and extend increases in sales tax and vehicle license fees for five years in order to raise some $9 billion annually in revenues.
The obstacles Brown faces are enormous. In 2009, 65 percent of California voters rejected Proposition 1A, which temporarily would have extended those tax increases. Voters also rejected Proposition 1D, a measure that would have redirected tobacco tax revenues destined for early childhood education programs to the General Fund. Brown wants voters to revisit the tobacco-tax money pot, too.
That makes two Brown-inspired measures planned for the June ballot, on top of two other measures -- term limits, taxing tobacco more -- that already have qualified. Voters tend to get ornery when they feel Sacramento is overworking them. Ask Arnold Schwarzenegger, whose political reform measures tanked in 2005.
Schwarzenegger may have won re-election in 2006, but he never recovered from those ballot measure losses.
Brown faces two other big obstacles: Democrats and Republicans.
Democratic legislative leaders have voiced grudging support for Brown's proposed cuts in Medi-Cal, welfare spending and higher education. The question is: Do they have the resolve to stick with those cuts? It took them 39 days past the budget deadline last year before Democrats -- Assembly Speaker John Perez and Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg -- could agree on a revenue plan. Even then their "tax swap" was a let's-pretend-we're-doing-something exercise.
Brown needs a handful of GOP votes to meet the two-thirds majority threshold needed to qualify a measure for the ballot. So far, he has none.
As Riverside County GOP Assemblyman Kevin Jeffries told me, "It's pretty risky for any Republican to go out there. One: The Democrats will beat you up in a (general election) campaign. Two: The Republicans will beat you up in a (primary election) campaign. And three: The voters have already spoken that they don't support tax increases. So what's the incentive?"
Brown adviser Steve Glazer answers: "Downsizing of state government unprecedented in their political careers."
There's talk of using arcane language in Proposition 25 to maneuver around the two-thirds requirement, but there's another reason the GOP leadership should cough up the votes to meet the established two-thirds rule -- they'll have a bigger place at the bargaining table.
In the negative column, as conservative Fox & Hounds blogger Joel Fox points out, Brown is asking voters to raise taxes without having won pension reforms or dangling a spending cap.
On the plus side, Democratic operative Roger Salazar noted, Brown's spending cuts have a lot of appeal for Democratic and Republican voters who think there's a lot of waste in state government.
"It's probably not as high as people think it is," said Salazar. But by paring his own budget and targeting cell phones, Brown has demonstrated that "if we're going to ask for cuts and additional sacrifice and an extension of the revenues, we're going to show you, it's going to be used wisely," Salazar said.
In the negative column, Brown didn't campaign on the need to raises taxes, only on the promise not to raise them without voter approval. He did not come to Sacramento armed with a mandate to raise taxes.
On the plus side, Democrats have little incentive to sabotage this plan, as happened in 2009 when the state Democratic Party refused to endorse Proposition 1A, even though the Democratic Legislature had put it on the ballot.
I've spent the week wondering: Does Brown think he's so charismatic that a majority of voters will approve what is essentially a tax increase, after 65 percent of voters said two years ago that they wouldn't?
Or is Brown relying on the fact that things are so bad that even schizophrenic California voters finally may realize that after years of electing representatives who spent more than they've taken in, they can't put off paying for the government they've chosen?
He's a democrat?
What Makes Brown Think He Can Get a Tax Increase?
How do ya think he got his nickname, “Moonbeam”?
Good point
If our politicians could just figure out how to get enough of our money, they could solve all our problems.
He doesn’t really think that. Typical politician.
The Dems are twisting the arms of the Repubs in DC for a bailout. The Repubs are starting to fold.
So, Brown and the media are all about “the sky is falling” and the Repubs will be humiliated into a bailout.
Just watch. “Since CA is integral to the economy, we are forced to bail them out.”
The “End of Days” for the USA is here. And we have no defenders.
3 reasons;
Because it’s Kahleefawneeya, he’s a Dermocrat, and they know they willl get a future bailout.......(Too big to fail)
The TBTF analogy is perfect. Its all about labor union and big bank / IB power.
This is like a science fiction novel where they predicted a dismal urban area that controls the rural areas. A virtual slavery of the production with the unproductive urban masses consuming.
It is all a ruse in that these ‘attempts’ at constraining California’s impending fiscal collapse will amount to “we tried everything but” on the road to asking for a Fed bailout.... =.=
What Makes Brown Think He Can Get a Tax Increase? Well for one thing it’s California isn’t it?it’s the only thing the state leaders know what to do just another democrat controled state tax and spend.
Thaqt's EASY!
$150mil in Union advertising talking about all the old folks and children that will die within days of failure to enact them.
It's the Unions against both the poor and the taxpayers this time. While there are $billions in real cuts proposed by Brown...to programs and education etc...there is not an elimination of any of the odd-ball 500 agencies (Apprentice Standards Board?).
NOT ONE SINGLE LAY-OFF!!!!
To make matters worse, by moving programs to counties they are bypassing the state requirement for a 2/3 majority to raise taxes. If you live in the wrong county you can expect your taxes to go up...especially small business.
There's that false dichotomy again. It's a shame, because up until that ridiculous ending the column was interesting.
At that moment you WILL see secession.
Brown could save California alot of money by not haveing some sort of ‘election’ every year or so.
That costs far more than they want to admit.
Vote fraud.
10’s of millions of dollars in TV ads from union coffers could easily make it a runaway for passage. That, and they’ll spin it as no “new” taxes.
We all know, however, Big Labor will spend whatever it takes to brainwash voters into believing the end of the universe will come if taxes are not raised.
| He's a nut? |
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.