Don't forget how the media/left tried to pin this stuff on conservatives. What a disgrace.
He was a stark raving libtard truther moonbat.
In the video, Loughner states, “The war that we are in right now is currently illegal under the Constitution”;
LIBTARD.
He’s borderline mentally retarded. I don’t know how anyone as dumb as that could earn a B in anything. Nevermind he is crazy. Actually, I think his mental problems are not as serious as his low intellect. I think his IQ is more responsible for his actions that day in tucson than his mental health.
Tonight is the first time I have heard the word “shaboozie” (sic?). The shooter said that and I can’t find a real definition except for a link to rap. Must mean something!
.
None of what he says or does makes sense. Waste of time trying to rationalize liberalism.
I’m just shocked that this idiot could carry on like he did for so long and NOBODY did anything.
During this video it doesn’t take much of a mental midget to see he had more than a few loose screws. And he talked like he wrote. Carrying on about grammar, illegal currency, illiterate people, so much so that he must have been a real PITA to have in class.
What he said was non-sense but it wasn’t any more non-sensical than many college students or disaffect types. He did not sound stoned or intoxicated.
Reposting my previous comment from above:
If you want to see something amazing, check out this video. These are extremely liberal war protesters from the group 9/11 Truth who are very upset with Gabby Giffords over her support for the war and her refusal to support the impeachment of George W. Bush. They call her a war criminal and say that she's hiding the "lies" about 9/11/2001. Pay particular attention to the guy at around 1:45 and what he says. He's an obvious pothead wacko - the same sort of guy that Jared Loughner appears to be, although Loughner clearly has less social skills than this guy, if that is possible. Now, I'm not accusing the 9/11 Truth movement of anything. I don't think that the people in this group had anything to do with the shooting on Saturday, nor do I think that they should be prevented from accusing Giffords of being a war criminal who is sending young men to be shot in the head without justification. I'm just offering a possible alternate explanation for what happened. What if that idea that Giffords is sending young men to be shot in the head clicked with Loughner in a way that mixed with his already existing anger towards Giffords - and he decided that he was going to pay her back in kind? Do I have any evidence that that is what happened? No. Just this video, which is WAY more than any Democrat has linking Sarah Palin to this.
9/11 Truthers Protest Giffords
Now, check out the video at this website, which is a video made by Loughner in his own words as he walks around the Pima Community College campus. Notice that he talks about how we are engaged in two wars, and that "the war we are in right now is currently illegal under the Constitution."
So, now we have a video showing that among all the weird thoughts rattling around in this guy's head, at least one of them was directly related to the idea that our involvement in a war is illegal under the Constitution, which is the same thing that the protestors in the other video believe. So, now we have a direct link between their ideas and his ramblings. These people think she is a war criminal and think she is responsible for getting young men "shot in the head" by sending them over there to fight, and then a young man with an unstable mind who shares their views and happens to have a pre-existing grudge against Giffords decides to shoot her in the head. I think this is a plausible scenario and probably pretty close to the truth.
I'm waiting for apologies from anyone who thought that conservatives had anything to do with this.