Opinion: Fishermen are worse than BP?

However, according to Jane Lubchenco, head of NOAA, in a statement in the Miami Herald on Dec. 30, in her estimation it wasn't BP and the biggest accidental oil spill that the world has ever seen or the wanton use, with her approval, of toxic chemical dispersants that was responsible for the dead turtles.

Last year's BP oil spill resulted in 1 1/2 to 2 1/2 million gallons of petroleum products being released into the Gulf of Mexico every day for three months.

It was the largest accidental oil spill that has ever been inflicted on any ocean anywhere. It resulted in floating oil slicks and subsurface oil plumes that were hundreds of miles in extent.

Exacerbating a horrendous situation, with the blessing of the feds the people at BP sprayed and injected millions of gallons of chemical dispersants, chemicals the use of which has been outlawed abroad because of their toxic environmental effects, into the Gulf waters that they had already done such a thorough job of contaminating to "break up" the oil in some totally misguided effort based on "out of sight, out of mind."

Needless to say, none of this was particularly good for the flora or fauna of the Gulf. This fact was brought home by the 600 or so dead turtles that were collected from the areas affected by the spill and by the dispersants used to "control" it.

Now anyone who has followed Ms. Lubchenco's career, either before or since taking control at NOAA, wouldn't be surprised to discover that she would be willing to hold fishermen responsible for anything bad that's happened since the day that primitive humankind discovered that fish were good to eat.

But her attempt to pin the blame for the dead sea turtles on fishermen is stretching the bounds of credulity farther than she's ever stretched them before (and that's up to and including the prediction that our oceans would be populated with nothing but jellyfish at some point in the future because of fishing.)

Her statement about the turtle deaths and fishing was "while nearly all the rescued sea turtles were visibly oiled, to our surprise, most of the dead stranded sea turtles had no observable oil on their bodies and were in good health prior to their death. Necropsies (autopsies on animals) on more than half of 600 carcasses point to the possibility that a majority may have drowned in fishing gear."

So we have thousands of Gulf fishermen who, because of BP's actions and the government's lack of effective oversight, lost their markets and at least half a year's worth of fishing and were actually getting some well-deserved public sympathy.

Yet Ms. Lubchenco appears unwilling to put up with that, so with the careful use of words that no one will be able to hold her accountable for, she seems to be doing what she can to stop that sympathy its tracks.

And, as an added benefit, she'll probably be able to get rid of even more fishing boats, and fishermen, in the bargain.

As is becoming increasingly evident, it's well past the time when the powers that be in the Department of Commerce, the Obama Administration and in Congress should give serious consideration to the real-world implications of having someone with such a profound bias against fishermen and fishing as Ms. Lubchenco so obviously does at the helm of the NOAA.

After decades of demonstrating that they are world leaders in the conservation of species after species, our fishermen deserve more from Washington than a target painted on their collective backs.

Nils Stolpe of SavingSeafood.org is a longtime fishing industry consultant and an investigative reproter and colunnist with National Fisherman magazine.

There are two ways to approach diminished numbers of animals and plants.

One way is to be oppressive to people, demand that they do with less, suffer more, and diminish their lives while increasing government control. This is the socialist way.

The other way is to create more animals and plants. A technique bitterly opposed by socialists, because it does not advance the socialist agenda, and just solves the problem.

In this case, if you want more commercial and wild fish, set up inexpensive fish farms, far enough off the coast so that they don’t trouble the coastal waters.

This is easy, just a small boat that puts out a ring of pontoons, with double descending nets from them. Put healthy hatchery fish in there, either to grow into food fish, or to eventually release into the wild to replenish wild fish stocks. The ocean current handles the aeration and cleaning of the water.

Feed them Purina Fish Chow. When they have grown to the proper size, haul the nets up and load the fish aboard a ship, either to take to port to harvest, or keep them in tanks on the ship, releasing as needed to join them to wild fish schools when commercial fishermen aren’t around.

Not only are the raised fish healthier than the wild fish, and less inflicted with parasites, but in cross breeding with the wild fish, they will produce healthier offspring.

Several experimental versions of this have been done, and worked like a charm, as it is a variation of such programs used on land to replenish other animals and plants, to include insects, amphibians, and all the way up to hoofed wild animals and California condors.

No reason to hurt or deprive people at all. Unless you’re a socialist.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.