Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Driving the Day: No Domestic Energy for You
Heritage Foundation ^ | January 14, 2011 | Dan Holler

Posted on 01/14/2011 6:59:28 AM PST by La Lydia

In what the Wall Street Journal dubbed as an “unusual move,” President Obama’s Environmental Protection Agency announced yesterday that is was reversing a Bush-era decision and revoking a critical permit for the largest mountaintop-removal coal mining projects ever proposed in Appalachia. According to the Journal:

The decision to revoke the permit for Arch Coal Inc.’s Spruce Mine No. 1 in West Virginia’s rural Logan County marks the first time the EPA has withdrawn a water permit for a mining project that had previously been issued.

It’s also only the second time in the 39-year history of the federal Clean Water Act that the agency has canceled a water permit for a project of any kind after it was issued, according to the agency.

The decision places valuable coal off limits and cancels a $250 million investment in southern West Virginia that would have created 250 jobs in an economically depressed region. It also calls into question the future of coal in America, especially under the current administration.

This administration favors what appears to be a no-energy approach – placing valuable resources off limits, from coal to oil and natural gas. Fortunately, conservatives are fighting back. According to reports this morning, Senator John Barrasso (R-WY) is planning to introduce legislation that would “broadly block federal climate rules under the Clean Air Act, the Endangered Species Act, the Clean Water Act and the National Environmental Policy Act.”

His effort is dubbed as the “strongest” and “most aggressive yet” to rein in a radical environmental agenda.

In the early days of the 112th Congress, Americans are being presented with a clear choice on a very consequential policy matter – how we will power our economy in the coming decades.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: appalachia; coal
"How miserable can we make you? Let me count the ways."
1 posted on 01/14/2011 6:59:30 AM PST by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

How’s that Hope and Change workin’ for ya, West Virginia?


2 posted on 01/14/2011 7:11:58 AM PST by Arm_Bears (I'll have what the gentleman on the floor is drinking.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia
This guy is well on his way to strangling all forms of conventional energy production which are essential for national security and maintaining any vestige of real economic activity. He must be taken on now in real meaningful fashion up to and including the defunding of these rogue agencies.

Instead of “Together we Thrive” the truth is becoming “Together we Won't Survive.”

3 posted on 01/14/2011 7:25:20 AM PST by bereanway (I'd rather have 40 Marco Rubios than 60 Arlen Specters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

Looks like the only way coal is gonna get mined in America is if Chinese-owned or controlled companies buy the mines and strike deals with the UMW to mine it, the Transportation unions to haul it, and the Teamsters to load it on Chinese ships at our ports


4 posted on 01/14/2011 7:34:39 AM PST by silverleaf (All that is necessary for evil to succeed, is that good men do nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

How will any company plan for future investments if these kind of things can be revoked after the fact?!


5 posted on 01/14/2011 7:34:43 AM PST by Eepsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

Who owns the land? Do they not have a right to do what they want with the land?

If they own the land and can do with it as they please, why do they need a permit?

If the federal government owns it, why don’t they sell it to pay down their debt?

If a private party owns it, what right does the government have to require a license to do with it as they choose?

Property rights: a kooky old idea no longer needed in the brave, new USSA.


6 posted on 01/14/2011 7:36:34 AM PST by MichiganConservative (Terrorists don't commit genocide. That's what governments do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia
Correct me if I'm wrong, but couldn't the carefully planned and constructed use of nuclear power make the need to mine this coal a moot point? There's no doubt this type of mining does harm to the environment and I for one am willing to accept the trade-off if it's really necessary. But so much of what we need and use could much more easily, cheaply and safely come from nuclear energy.

I might have some sympathy and support for their cause if the Greenies could name a source of energy acceptable to them. But instead they just seem to blindly oppose ANY source of energy in what I perceive as a desire to keep America down.

The life a coal miner and that of a coal mining community is not a great way of life. It's dangerous, it's dirty and of a necessity in this type of mining it's not good for the surrounding areas either.

7 posted on 01/14/2011 7:46:57 AM PST by jwparkerjr (It's the Constitution, Stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

Were Robert Byrd still Senator I don’t think this would have happened.


8 posted on 01/14/2011 7:53:50 AM PST by The Great RJ (The Bill of Rights: Another bill members of Congress haven't read.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwparkerjr

The same people who oppose coal mining also oppose nuclear power plants.


9 posted on 01/14/2011 7:57:10 AM PST by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

The lignite belt of Texas cuts across I-45 Near Centerville, Buffalo and Fairfield. I drive the road with more frequency than I care to and have watched the coal mining draglines there for years. Frankly, the land looks better and more productive after mining than it did before. The contours are more regular and erosion resistant than before. Inside of 50 years or so nobody that doesn’t know about the mining will know the difference.

We have enough rules already.. no more needed. Paring back of rules is what we do need.


10 posted on 01/14/2011 8:04:13 AM PST by Sequoyah101 (Half of the population is below average)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

“Cancels $250 million investment”.

Clarify, please...

How much money had already been spent?

How much money was waiting for operations to begin?

What happens to the money that is still sitting there from stockholders & does it get back to them- even if on a partial basis?

Another thought:

$250 million didn’t come from just one buyer of stock. ALL those stockholders are sitting on a huge loss & have to file their income taxes for 2011—or maybe even usable in 2010. How many dollars of income tax to the Feds will be wiped out by such an arbitrary action???

Another blow to the income needed to even try to start paying down the debt this Administration & Congress has compiled.

The dumbest part to me is that a great majority of the energy used east of the Mississippi is supplied by coal.
That area certainly includes WASHINGTON D.C.

How will Congress & the White House like things when THEY have no power—literally!!??


11 posted on 01/14/2011 8:08:47 AM PST by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

All you Mountaineers pulling the Dem lever, lotsa luck! You need to find out what PA knows - get a Republican governor who reverses the anti drilling ban set forth by Dems and the environmental weenies.


12 posted on 01/14/2011 8:09:59 AM PST by Ciexyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

Obama DID promise to destroy the coal industry...


13 posted on 01/14/2011 8:21:56 AM PST by cake_crumb (Why do they call them "pat downs" when they're obviously "feel ups"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwparkerjr

Nuke power makes good sense. Our kenyan president made the announcement a while back that they were going to clear the way to build several new nuke plants. Then they closed Yucca mountain effectively stopping any new nuke plant being built.
They have put a choke hold on the oil drilling industry using the permit process. Yeah they lifted the moratorium, but made the permit process impossible and let that industry know that they would be operating in a dynamic regulatory environment. That’s 10 dollar words for “we will change the rules at any time”. Effectivly shutting down drilling.
Now the EPA is not allowing a coal facility when we have lots of coal fired power plants still operating. Shrink the supply of coal and watch the prices skyrocket. Hmmm who said that? Electricity prices necessarily skyrocketing?
Name that kenyan.


14 posted on 01/14/2011 8:47:28 AM PST by Texas resident (Hunkered Down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

Somebody explain to me why West Virginia keeps voting for Democrats.

Obama publicly announced that he intended to bankrupt the coal industry, although the media quickly put a lid on it.

Also, the oil industry. And the natural gas industry. And the nuclear industry—which was closed down years ago by Jimmy Carter and Jane Fonda. But Obama will make sure that it never starts up again.


15 posted on 01/14/2011 8:59:47 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson