Posted on 01/12/2011 2:41:45 PM PST by Nachum
Wednesday Sarah Palin responded to the vicious blood libel leveled against her and millions of right-thinking Americans by the army of destroyers. The ferocious, relentless attacks on Sarah Palin are a testament to her greatness, proof of how deathly afraid of her they are, like Dracula to the silver cross.
It’s envy. Ayn Rand said it: “Envy is regarded by most people as a petty, superficial emotion and, therefore, it serves as a semihuman cover for so inhuman an emotion that those who feel it seldom dare admit it even to themselves….That emotion is: hatred of the good for being the good.”
Here’s the thing. The mission, by objective, of the haters, the party of destruction, is to ruin the best, the brightest, the good. The left has, day after day, month after month, year after year, decade after decade, trafficked only in ruin and destruction, focusing on the most effective leaders on the right.
Name one, one, Republican president the voluntary-state-run media has liked. Forget liked, has given a fair shake? Name one Republican they supported. The only Republican the media can cotton to is a RINO (Republican In Name Only) or one who is sure to lose (i.e. old, middle of the road RINO McCain).
(Excerpt) Read more at biggovernment.com ...
Sarah is exactly right because all conservatives were libeled. I personally heard Dupenik accuse Sharon Angle, Limbaugh, Beck, Fox News, the Tea Party, and he libeled “one party” (obviously the GOP).
How about a Sarah Palin - Pam Geller ticket? Two gals who kick ass all over the globe!
This is EXACTLY the medicine needed. Excellent post!
Certain persons wet their pants when they consider Sarah Palin. They afraid of her because she will cause them to lose power and control that they now have. One can only imagine how vitriolic they will become.
Sorry; I thought we had established that, no, the lamestream does not and will not like ANY Republican president while they are still alive. However, they do seem to like Republicans who have proven their ability to LOSE. They seem fond of Ford (post-loss), Bush 1 (post-loss), and of course, Dole (perpetual loser). McCain (post-loss) is also an acceptable loser, although they worry that as a Senator he could still hurt their boy.
Yep, and at the heart of it all is in fact ENVY. The left envies her happiness, her success, her new wealth, her ability to influence others, her family, her husband, her good looks, and her traditional, conservative values that enable her to stay focused no matter what they say or do to try to stop her.
I'm going to have to re-read Rand. Some powerful stuff there.
Does she write her own material? When she speaks the words it seems as if they are “hers” rather than the feeling of being “acted” or read or reported. She is a natural leader and her voice sounds better too (a bit lower than in the past).
Ayn Rand had it right but Milton said it first...check my tagloine.
I’d rather lose with the right guy than win with the wrong one. Palin in 2012.
Exactly my thoughts!
I am compiling a list of fallacies used in this (and other) arguments especially in re the Tucson shootings.
As many FReepers know, I am a strong advocate for not only learning what these fallacies are, but the need to call anyone using them on the use. It is imperative to refute these.
For anyone who wants to read a real life program about using these things in everyday life, please see Earl Shorris’ “On the uses of a liberal education: 2. As a weapon in the hands of the restless poor.” Harper’s (Sept. 1997): 50-60. http://www.honorshumanities.umd.edu/105Readings.pdf
People hunger for know how to articulate their thoughts adequately. No matter their income level. Being able to do it simply means getting familiar with the tools to do it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.