Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: goldstategop

I think that many are missing the point. CCW or not, does ANYONE think that a law or lacking a CCW permtui would have caused this nutjob to NOT carry and shoot this Congresswoman and those around her?

Law, permit or whatever, does ANYONE think he would have recognized ANY kind of restriction?

Let’s get real here and focus on the real issue.

This guy, so far, appears to have been a nutjob who didn’t recognize any limits on his ability or capacity to shoot and kill someone.

Isn’t it against the law to shoot at or try and kill someone? Isn’t that enough? What does having or not having a flippin’ permit or not have to do with it?


28 posted on 01/10/2011 12:19:37 PM PST by BFM (CLINTON is and always will be a rapist. Never forget!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: BFM

The question for any of these gun control types is

how would you frame a law that would keep someone bent on committing murder from obtaining a weapon while not affecting those who have no such intent?

They don’t really care a hoot about the latter, but it’s good to expose them.

(so... you’re not really about preventing murder so much as you are about making sure the law abiding can’t defend themselves)


29 posted on 01/10/2011 12:27:13 PM PST by MrB (The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson