Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bill to Ban Crosshairs
New York Times ^ | January 9, 2011

Posted on 01/09/2011 3:57:36 PM PST by Second Amendment First

Representative Bob Brady of Pennsylvania told The Caucus he plans to introduce a bill that would ban symbols like that now-infamous campaign crosshair map.

"You can't threaten the president with a bullseye or a crosshair," Mr. Brady, a Democrat, said, and his measure would make it a crime to do so to a member of Congress or federal employee, as well.

Asked if he believed the map incited the gunman in Tucson, he replied, "I don't know what's in that nut's head. I would rather be safe than sorry."

(Excerpt) Read more at thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: banglist; bobbrady; giffords; leftwingnuts; moreevilhasbeendone; surveyorsmarks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last
All sorts of new crimes coming it sounds like.

"Never let a crisis go to waste"

1 posted on 01/09/2011 3:57:37 PM PST by Second Amendment First
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

These people are terminally stupid, there’s no cure.


2 posted on 01/09/2011 3:59:30 PM PST by rbosque (12 year Freeper!!! Combat Economist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

Bob Brady, you’re an idiot!


3 posted on 01/09/2011 4:00:04 PM PST by Reagan Man ("In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First
Next 'logical' step is to not allow heated questions at Townhalls.

And the next after that is to not allow questions of our leaders at all.

4 posted on 01/09/2011 4:00:13 PM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First
"You can't threaten the president with a bullseye or a crosshair," Mr. Brady, a Democrat, said, and his measure would make it a crime to do so to a member of Congress or federal employee, as well.

Unless he's a republican.

The "snipers wanted" graphic seems to have disappeared down the memory hole...

5 posted on 01/09/2011 4:00:17 PM PST by null and void (We are now in day 719 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

What a maroon... moron...whatever


6 posted on 01/09/2011 4:01:11 PM PST by bossmechanic (If all else fails, hit it with a hammer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

By all means, it is time to overreact. I think this loony guy would have taken a potshot at any elected official yesterday. It just happens to be Rep Giffords who was the intended target. If McCain had been there speaking he would have been the target.
I have an idea. How about banning politically correct speech. How about some plain talk like Will Rogers would use?


7 posted on 01/09/2011 4:01:19 PM PST by celtic gal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

Where was this rocket scientist back when crosshairs were being superimposed over Bush’s face?


8 posted on 01/09/2011 4:01:38 PM PST by Steely Tom (Obama goes on long after the thrill of Obama is gone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

Who needs satire when reality is such a farce?


9 posted on 01/09/2011 4:01:52 PM PST by skr (May God confound the enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

Includes the crucifix?


10 posted on 01/09/2011 4:02:06 PM PST by Kirkwood (Zombie Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First
"You can't threaten the president with a bullseye or a crosshair," Mr. Brady, a Democrat, said,...

Exactly!

So why are you wanting to ban them, you mutton head?

11 posted on 01/09/2011 4:02:24 PM PST by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rbosque

LMAO, completely and utterly ridiculous.


12 posted on 01/09/2011 4:02:24 PM PST by GoCards (Why me? Why not me?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

“”Never let a crisis go to waste”

Never let the opportunity to get your name on bill go to waste


13 posted on 01/09/2011 4:02:36 PM PST by nuconvert ( Khomeini promised change too // Hail, Chairman O)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

Anyone who signs on to this nonsense is a fool. This is only to try to keep blaming this on something that had no involvement in this.

But...I bet our Congress goobs don’t have the guts to tell this RAT he is an idiot.


14 posted on 01/09/2011 4:02:56 PM PST by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

The buffoons on Capitol Hill have way too much time on their hands. It’s time for a part time Congress. Those pinheads have too much time for silly mischief like this.


15 posted on 01/09/2011 4:02:56 PM PST by FlingWingFlyer (DNC memo - "Don't let this thing go to waste! Exploit! Exploit! Exploit!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

Brady’s an effing idiot.


16 posted on 01/09/2011 4:03:09 PM PST by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will, they ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

This proposed law is unconstitutional. Case closed.


17 posted on 01/09/2011 4:05:10 PM PST by Signalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First
...his measure would make it a crime to do so to a member of Congress or federal employee, as well.

However, it will still be okay for someone to publish a picture of Joe Sixpack with a bullseye or crosshairs over his face. Brady is an ***hole.

18 posted on 01/09/2011 4:05:20 PM PST by FlingWingFlyer (DNC memo - "Don't let this thing go to waste! Exploit! Exploit! Exploit!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First
Well they will have to clean up the Democrats sites then... Democrats use "bulls eye" targets extensively in their political graphics. This map shows states Democrats want targeted. Arizona, which Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords represents, is surrounded by these targets. http://hillbuzz.org/2011/01/08/my-congresswoman-voted-against-nancy-pelosi-and-is-now-dead-to-me-eerie-daily-kos-hit-piece-on-gabrielle-giffords-just-two-days-before-assassination-attempt-on-her/ see also http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2654003/posts
19 posted on 01/09/2011 4:06:20 PM PST by FromLori (FromLori">)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: celtic gal

He apparently didn’t like Giffords’ vote for someone other than Pelosi, so it seems more than likely that he did have a specific target in mind.


20 posted on 01/09/2011 4:06:28 PM PST by skr (May God confound the enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson