Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article




1 posted on 01/09/2011 7:49:13 AM PST by Jeff Chandler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Jeff Chandler
These aren't capitol ships. There is a limit to how much damage a smaller vessel can sustain. But soon I'm sure, all the armchair Generals and Admirals will be along to express their outrage. Much like they did when they discovered that a Humvee couldn't withstand antitank mines.
2 posted on 01/09/2011 7:59:20 AM PST by SunTzuWu (Political correctness does not legislate tolerance; it only organizes hatred. - Barzun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Chandler
I don't know anything about the LCS. It is, however, pretty common knowledge that the acquisition process is broken for military contracts. As costs rise, and as schedules slip, it is not uncommon for capabilities to be reduced. You end up with a product which is very expensive and very late, and which doesn't do what you wanted it to do.

Many parts of the federal budget need cutting much more than Defense, but if DoD did a better job of spending their dollars, it would be easier to avoid cuts. As it is, I expect Dept of Education and Dept of Energy to retain most of their dollars, and DoD to lose a fair chunk. It shouldn't be that way, but this is, in part, self-inflicted.

3 posted on 01/09/2011 8:10:15 AM PST by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NY Attitude

ping for later


4 posted on 01/09/2011 8:13:46 AM PST by NY Attitude (Make love not war but be prepared for either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Chandler
Actually, the American LCS is pictured below. The photo you featured is the ship being built by the Chinese from plans and specs hand-carried by Obozo on his last trip over there.

Photobucket

Armed with a single MA-2 .50 caliber Browning, this much feared naval vessel carries up to 30 rounds of aluminum piercing ammunition. It is the first in an entirely new naval architecture class -- technically, “clitoral” (not to be confused with “littoral”) -- being pushed on the Pentagon by the defense minded wussies in the Obama Administration as a cost-saving measure. If you look closely, you can see the heavy-duty seat restraint which prevents the pilot/gunner – Kamakazi Kowalski – from leaping from the vessel prior to engaging the enemy. The 12 V trolling motor – which lacks a reverse function -- propels this sophisticated craft forward at a top speed of 4 knots. Reverse travel – at approximately 35 knots -- is achieved by firing the Browning.

The no-bid contract to build 200 of these fearsome warships has been awarded to Obama-Soros-Emanuel Shipbuilding and Stormdoor Manufacturing (formerly General Dynamics) and will be administered by trusted Obama associate and former Chief-of-Staff Rahm Emanuel who commented that, at $12 million each, they are a bargain. They will be constructed exclusively at the company’s facility in Kenya with major subcomponent production (rivets and miscellaneous fasteners) at the company’s Harlem and Skokie plants. Delivery is expected to begin in 2024 (or as soon as the subcontractors’ funds are safely in the contractor's Swiss account).

12 posted on 01/09/2011 8:48:48 AM PST by Dick Bachert (2012 CAN'T COME SOON ENOUGH FOR ME. HOW ABOUT YOU?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Chandler

Less firepower than a PT Boat, but very whizzy. It’s main mission is to intimdate people in motor launches, ensure the safety of procurement officers and maintain the steady employment of contractors.

Literally, if this thing ran into a little WWII era destroyer escort, it would be doomed, with no way to fight back. (except of course, it could run away) Sounds like a Joke until you look at what most foreign navies drive around in.

It’s not even safe in the Carribean.


19 posted on 01/09/2011 10:05:27 AM PST by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Chandler

self ping


20 posted on 01/09/2011 10:09:48 AM PST by shove_it (old Old Guardsman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Chandler

Because the takers have voted more “safety net” for themselves than the makers have paid for,....

...aren’t we at the mercy of only sustaining military capabilities that the Chinese will finance for us??


35 posted on 01/09/2011 3:07:16 PM PST by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson