####
Well that is disappointing.
I did not see your post, but know that your thoughts are invariably factual, evenhanded and informative.
The “comment deleted” standards are a bit inconsistently applied I believe; I'm approaching an even half dozen comments of mine that have been deleted.
Having said that, I don't envy the mods their jobs. It cannot be an easy task to police a Board, even one overwhelmingly full of intelligent, polite and reasonable conservatives.
I'm not sure what you said, but I can relate that in the past here on FR I've been pleased to have been able to correctly and clearly label the diseased culture being discussed. I would provide examples, but then you might not seen this response. Ha!
Why is it important to allow plain, blunt talk?
The first step to solving a problem is to define it, and not obfuscate its source or causative factors.
Whether it gets deleted or not usually depends on whether someone reports it as abuse or not.
Like I said, I stated the same thing you did, but instead of referencing the culture, I named it.
And, I maintain that it’s not “racist” to do so.
It is indeed “culturist”, and if anyone wants to debate me on whether some cultures are worth condemnation while others are worth lauding, I’ll gladly take up that argument.
“Racism” is the belief that some people groups are genetically superior to others. I never make such an argument. My worldview includes and stems from the belief that we are all decendents of one pair of created humans, and therefore none of us are “less evolved”, ie genetically closer to animals, than others.