Posted on 01/06/2011 5:17:20 AM PST by markomalley
Pure sickness. Normal people are not attracted to their offspring. It must be something built in. I have two gorgeous daughters and have never been attracted to either.
You just had to throw in Lot, didn’t ya?
Genesis 19:30-38
My family has been in this country since l620, and I have traced every member of the family down to my generation, and not one of them married a cousin or anything close. In fact, Gov Bradford (my ancestor) sent back to England for a new wife when his first wife died during that first year. And guess what, I’m a Republican. So that kind of proves what some are saying about inbreeding.
You as well as the majority of leftists and many libertarians seem to follow what is known as the Witches rede:
“An Ye Harm None, Do What Ye Will”
To me it seems that most of the left-wing and most libertarians seem to think that these words are a part of our Constitution but they are not. These words were originally coined by the man who called himself “The Beast” – Aliester Crowley and were then later altered to include the part about ‘no harm’, his original wording was ‘Do As Thou Wilt Shall Be the Whole of the Law”. In other words do anything you want because the human will is paramount.
It is interesting to me that Crowley was what you would call a libertine (a A libertine is one devoid of most moral restraints) and that this perversion of the ideal of liberty seems to have been adopted by many who call themselves libertarians. The libertarian party motto being “Live and Let Live” seems to imply that you should not have to follow anyone’s else moral laws.
Yet of course this type of thinking strips the people of the ‘right to representation’ being that it allows no moral laws to be passed. It also leaves the definition of the word ‘harm’ up to only the judgment of a panel of judges and not up to ‘We the People’.
Yet the main point I have to make here is that these words (the Wiccan rede) are NOT in our Constitution. It is a continual lie that is repeated by leftists and libertarians that this has anything at all to do with our Constitution or the thinking of the Founders.
It is this type of thinking that is leading to the moral decay and destruction of our society. It is damaging to children and will eventually destroy true liberty in this nation.
You just had to throw in Lot, didn’t ya?
LOL. Yep. My post had something for both sides in the debate, I guess.
mother and her little boy - who was wearing a pink tutu.
Interesting example you brought up, now for the rest of the story:
Both of Lot's daughters got Lot drunk and had sex with him, both resulting in pregnancies.
If they want to do “what ye will,” they should go live under a bridge. I’m fine with that. One less freak in our midst.
Trouble is, they keep coming out to forage and prey on innocents.
In fact, nowadays they are bold enough to approach the Supreme Court.
Rousseau himself would blush.
Same situation here, the very thought of it would make me ill.
I have grown grand daughters too (all beautiful of course) and the same applies to them.
We are Rome...... And Rome is burning.
I think there’s a fine distinction there, and you appear to understand it well. To wit, just because the state doesn’t criminalize an activity, it doesn’t mean that activity should be celebrated or endorsed by the state. In other words, sodomy should probably be legal, but that doesn’t mean the state should subsidize or affirm sodomy via gay marriage, right?
668: “And yet these same liberal elites who think it’s ok to commit incest with your daughter, think you need to be formally forbidden to procure her a hamburger over 600 calories.”
Crazy, isn’t it?
The reason that they are becoming so emboldened is because of this leftist/libertarian mindset that believes that the Wiccan rede is part of the Constitution. It is not.
Ever watch Idocracy.
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
No, but I did watch Idiocracy, did you? Idiocracy is a documentary based on current conditions as far as I can tell.
Unfortunately, in our society, if it isn't prohibited, the implication is that it is condoned, endorsed, and fully protected by our non-discrimination laws.
Yes. May I offer a perfect example of the possible results: Prince Charles and his sister, Princess Anne. Ah, the House of “Windsor”.
This is all a part of the homosexual agenda.
You are correct. It is quite simply no concern of the State's.
L
Which is the other side of the same coin. It is, as I said, quite simply none of the State's business either way. It should neither be protected nor criminalized.
A moral State exists for three basic purposes and those are to protect the lives, property, and Rights of its citizens. Period.
L
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.