Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Army Relieves 172nd Infantry Brigade Commander
Stars and Stripes ^ | January 05, 2011 | Seth Robson

Posted on 01/05/2011 8:15:19 PM PST by Stayfrosty

GRAFENWÖHR, Germany -- The Army has relieved the commander of the 172nd Infantry Brigade, shortly before the unit intensifies its training for an Afghanistan deployment this summer.

(Excerpt) Read more at military.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Germany; Government; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: afghanistan; army; command; germany

1 posted on 01/05/2011 8:15:24 PM PST by Stayfrosty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Stayfrosty

Some one pissed off a General, more to follow?


2 posted on 01/05/2011 8:19:40 PM PST by Bringbackthedraft (The candidate they smear and ridicule the most is the one they fear the most.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stayfrosty

Anyone giving odds on this being over DADT? I smell a PC rat.


3 posted on 01/05/2011 8:20:11 PM PST by Humble Servant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stayfrosty

This guy has a lot of combat experience and attended the Army War College. They don’t select you for the Army War College if they don’t think you can cut the mustard at a higher command level. This sounds more like an O6 who couldn’t get along with his O7, who really has no right commanding a Corps. Bet he didn’t agree with some of the O7’s policies, so out he goes.

Another victim of political correctness-—Who’s next?


4 posted on 01/05/2011 8:21:18 PM PST by Tea Party Reveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tea Party Reveler

I thought all promotions above O-5 were political.


5 posted on 01/05/2011 8:32:39 PM PST by vmpolesov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Stayfrosty

OK, was this one for sexist comments? Or “gay bashing”? Or maybe both?


6 posted on 01/05/2011 8:36:55 PM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stayfrosty

Just looking at the photo, I sort of hate to say it, but he looks like a fruit.


7 posted on 01/05/2011 8:42:09 PM PST by ratsreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stayfrosty

What did this guy do? Look cross-eyed at a terrorist?


8 posted on 01/05/2011 8:52:35 PM PST by Just A Nobody ( (Better Dead than RED! NEVER AGAIN...Support our Troops! Beware the ENEMEDIA))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vmpolesov
I thought all promotions above O-5 were political.

Well, my promotion to O6 wasn't. Beyond that, I think you're right. I knew there was no way I was ever going to make O7, so when my obligation was up, I turned in my papers.

9 posted on 01/05/2011 8:55:06 PM PST by JoeFromSidney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JoeFromSidney

I was being a little facetious. I know that promotions above O-7 are literally political, in that they have to be approved by the President, right?

One of my military instructors in college (an O-5) groused about promotions beyond his rank being political.


10 posted on 01/05/2011 9:11:34 PM PST by vmpolesov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ratsreek
Just looking at the photo, I sort of hate to say it, but he looks like a fruit.

That's a lousy picture. The camera was so close it distorted his face.

11 posted on 01/05/2011 9:18:55 PM PST by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Stayfrosty

This seems a little odd. He appears to have a terrific background and experience in the field.

I don’t ever recall reading a story like this. There’s obviously much more to this than we are seeing, which is next to nothing at this point.

I’d imagine he probably said, or did something to piss off the wrong person/people.


12 posted on 01/05/2011 9:20:08 PM PST by KoRn (Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ratsreek
"Just looking at the photo, I sort of hate to say it, but he looks like a fruit."

The person that fired him for 'losing confidence'. Hmmmm

13 posted on 01/05/2011 10:08:34 PM PST by mewykwistmas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Stayfrosty

Seems unusual to dump the top NCO also. It’s not like they are joined at the hip going from command to command.


14 posted on 01/05/2011 10:39:11 PM PST by VeniVidiVici (My baloney has a first name, it's DEMOCRAT; my baloney has a second name, it's PARTY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
[quote]“… due to loss of confidence in his ability to command.”[/quote]

Don't know about the other services but in the Navy, 90% of the time when you read that an Officer got shit canned for "loss of confidence" it means they were having sexual relations with someone other than their wife or if single someone in the Chain Of Command junior to them.

15 posted on 01/05/2011 10:55:04 PM PST by Doofer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Doofer

Never mind I didn’t read the whole article.


16 posted on 01/05/2011 10:57:13 PM PST by Doofer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Stayfrosty
The Nazis secretly implanted in Stalin's mind that the Red Army was disloyal—thus a massive purge swept through the ranks and removed so many officers on trumped up charges the Soviet Union was at a terrible disadvantage when the Germans invaded.

The repeal of DADT is starting to have the same effect in the US Armed Forces—it is now allowed to remove non PC officers as disloyal because they do not openly embrace the homosexual agenda.

17 posted on 01/06/2011 3:35:40 AM PST by Happy Rain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Happy Rain

That’s a pretty interesting comment right there.


18 posted on 01/06/2011 3:40:53 AM PST by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Stayfrosty

Its always a good idea to try to find additional information before making comments on some of these articles. Those who have been wildly speculating that this was because some egotistical general was throwing his weight around, or that this was a certain sign of DADT purges, or some other brilliant comment might want to read the comments on the Army Times site, then revise and extend your remarks.

We can’t post stuff from Gannett, but go to the web site and see for yourself:

http://www.armytimes.com/

Sounds like the Corps Commander did the right thing and that’s what we pay General Officers to do.


19 posted on 01/06/2011 10:27:53 AM PST by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson