Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

You and I Live in the 21st Century -- Health Care Is Back in the 19th
American Thinker ^ | 01/05/2011 | Deanne Waldman

Posted on 01/05/2011 8:16:11 AM PST by SeekAndFind

Everyone complains about health care, but the real problem is healthcare.  As two words, health care is a service offered by trained professionals to people known as patients.  As one word, healthcare means the system in which the professionals work and where patients receive care.

The healthcare system is broken.  It doesn't work because healthcare still thinks it is in the 19th century, but we live in the 21st.

In the 19th century, there was a direct relationship between the doctor and the patient.  The doctor delivered both the baby and the bill.  The patient received the new child and paid the doctor for his services.

Today, health care is provided by a team.  When I asked my mother-in-law who her doctor was, she responded, "Northwestern University Hospital."  She could not identify an individual human being with a name.

Patients do not pay their bills today.  Insurance policies -- via private companies or government agencies -- pay our medical bills.  The lack of a direct fiduciary relationship between doctor and patient prevents the free market from functioning.

Micro-economic disconnection, as described in Uproot U.S. Healthcare, shows how separating or "disconnecting" supply and demand -- the free-market forces -- produces an ever-rising, unsupportable cost spiral.  Because the patient doesn't pay the bill, he or she has no reason to economize.  Because the doctor wants "everything done" and knows that an insurance company (not the patient) is paying the bill, the doctor has no incentive to economize.  The insurance company certainly does economize.  But under our current system, when an insurance company "economizes," it denies or delays our medical care. 

The phrase "moral hazard" describes how freely we spend money when it is not our own.  We have no hesitation going to the emergency room -- spending $500 -- for our child with a fever instead of going to the pediatrician and spending $40.  It makes no difference to our wallets, so why should we economize?

Harmful consequences of this disconnection -- consumer disconnected from payer -- extend well beyond money.  Many people use the word "fiduciary" to refer solely to financial relationships.  However, a fiduciary is someone who temporarily accepts power or authority from one person to use for the benefit of that person.  A patient gives power to the doctor -- in the role of fiduciary -- to cut the patient open and operate.  If any other person did what the surgeon does, it would be classified as attempted murder.

In today's disconnected (patient-to-doctor) world of medical teams, third-party payers, and malpractice lawyers, the fiduciary relationship is gone, and with it went our faith in doctors.  Though today's doctors can do so much more for us than doctors could in the 19th century, we no longer trust them.  They have fallen from God.  They have passed through fiduciary and are now approaching "perp" (perpetrator) status.

Nineteenth-century scientists developed laws or rules in physics, chemistry, and mechanics.  They could precisely predict events like where a planet would be or how much bicarbonate we get each time when we add H2O to CO2.  As medical capabilities dramatically improved over the years, patients continued to expect the same degree of predictability in medicine as in physics or math.  We thought doctors could guarantee a specific outcome to a specific patient.

In the 20th century, Werner Heisenberg enunciated the uncertainty principle and showed that we couldn't predict or guarantee anything at all.  Nevertheless, healthcare stayed with Newton's mechanical predictable world.  Today, instead of accepting a bad medical outcome as misfortune, unavoidable human error, or limitations of medical knowledge, healthcare blames the doctor, cementing her or his 21st-century status as a perp.

In the 19th century, the highest measure of success was efficiency.  The quicker and cheaper you did something, the better.  The person who makes the most widgets in an eight-hour shift is the best.  So today, if the best doctor is the most efficient, then the best doctor sees the most patients per day and therefore spends the least time with each patient.  But wait!  That is not right.  That is not what patients want, nor is it the way to practice quality medicine.

Right now, my hospital expects me to be efficient.  This translates to my seeing 4.2 patients per hour, which allows fourteen minutes per patient, seven of which are consumed with paperwork.  This is 19th-century thinking that produces perverse incentives: the system rewarding the very behaviors we don't want.

If you want a healthcare system that works, drag it from the 19th century into the 21st

J.D. Waldman, M.D., MBA is a tenured professor, practicing physician, systems thinker, adjunct scholar for the Rio Grande Foundation, and the author of Uproot U.S. Healthcare.



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 21stcentury; healthcare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 01/05/2011 8:16:13 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“The healthcare system is broken. “

Where is it broken? This is one of the worst comments I continue to hear - yet no one says where it is broken.

Health Care is not broken. What is broken is the government regulations attacking it and trial lawyers making millions from it.

I have used the “healtcare” system over the years with my family and have never had a problem.


2 posted on 01/05/2011 8:19:06 AM PST by edcoil (Democrat's and vampires should never be invited in your home.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
In the 19th century, there was a direct relationship between the doctor and the patient. The doctor delivered both the baby and the bill. The patient received the new child and paid the doctor for his services.

This was bad because?

3 posted on 01/05/2011 8:21:22 AM PST by null and void (We are now in day 715 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
I presume Dr. Waldman has another article somewhere explaining how to do that.

drag it from the 19th century into the 21st.

4 posted on 01/05/2011 8:21:56 AM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edcoil

Where is it broken ... we’ll let me share here.

I had a routine physical exam Dec 8th. Age 50-60 male, live in Florida. Blood work was ordered and blood was given Dec 27th.
I wanted to wait to call the doctors office until after the holiday’s so as to be nice. So I called yesterday, Jan 4th and ask for a copy of the blood work results. Fine so far right?

Doctor’s office is open and almost fully staffed yesterday. I called and the top Doctor is on vacation til next week. Everyone in the office is under orders that noone can get their records or blood results until he returns. Went through 3 females up to the office manager and got the same ole directive in my face. Now I paid for these tests because I paid for my insurance.

I now call the lab where they took the blood. Female says we don’t have results here, so I get phone number for Tampa office where the blood tubes were sent. Female there told me Florida is not a RIGHT TO KNOW state so they won’t provide me with my own results unless my doctor authorizes it. (He’s away for 6 more days) So suddenly lack of a ‘right to know’ statue allows this company to implement a ‘right to deny’ policy.

Tell me the system isn’t broken. There was a day when the patient was the customer but now, the doctors, labs and insurance companies consider the patient as a commodity and toy with us as if we are outside our own health care.


5 posted on 01/05/2011 8:28:08 AM PST by George from New England (Escaped CT in 2006, now living north of Tampa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: edcoil

>>>Where is it broken? This is one of the worst comments I continue to hear - yet no one says where it is broken.<<<

I agree.

Just speaking anecdotally -

When I had my skin cancer, it took seven weeks from diagnosis to removal.

When I had what appeared to be a heart attack, I was seen immediately, followed by specialist after specialist, who saw me immediately, followed by a cure, which took a few weeks.

When I had gout, I was seen immediately, given medication on the spot.

When I caught brucellosis - on the tundra in western Alaska, by the way - I saw a doctor in Bethel immediately, was given a jet to fly me to Anchorage, where a doctor saw me within four hours.

When my wife was miscarrying our child, she was immediately driven 60 miles to the hospital, then given a room and doctor before checking for any indication whether or not she could pay or had insurance. We had neither. The hospital gave us care anyway, and a beautiful little boy, and decided not to bill us $280,000. If I ever win the lotto, that’s the first place the money is going.

I have relatives in England, Italy, and South Africa, and they all tell me that their health care is much, much worse. And yet we’re moving towards their systems. God help us.


6 posted on 01/05/2011 8:28:35 AM PST by redpoll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: edcoil

“Healthcare is broken” is typical leftist dribble... a more nuanced position might be “it’s healthcare cost that’s broken” something I would agree with (due to illegals, malpractice, and genuine inefficiencies).


7 posted on 01/05/2011 8:32:25 AM PST by Weird Tolkienish Figure
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Maybe it wouldn't be so broken if we turned it from “Healthcare” back into “Medical Care”. I am in charge of my own and my children's health care. We eat pretty well, exercise regularly, practice good hygiene, and know basic first aid.

You don't have to rush to the doctor for every bump, sniffle, fever, or pain. Suck it up.

8 posted on 01/05/2011 8:39:03 AM PST by Jack of all Trades (Stop the change - I want to get off!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: George from New England

Let me append. my wife also got a physical in the same time frame. Her third party company that gave her the mammogram, send results to BOTH her and the doctor’s office. She didn’t have to go groveling for her results.

Seems like women have special provisions that men don’t.

p.s. This doctor’s office, that I am no longer a patient of now, expected me to make a visit and pay another co-pay to review my results.

If I want my medical file sent to another doctor they will comply no charge. If I want my close files sent to my home address they will charge me.

It’s another industry running a racket. Time for us, the payer, to take a stand.


9 posted on 01/05/2011 8:40:53 AM PST by George from New England (Escaped CT in 2006, now living north of Tampa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: George from New England

I dont see where it is broken, you seem to have a delay in getting blood results returned. Over the Christmas holidays... the problems you noted are delays due to government regulation and lawsuits - the liability of a doctor not telling you.

Are they not allowed a vacation like you are? The fact you over the holidays decided to get work done does not show where or how an entire system is broken.

My wife had knee surgery the day before Thanksgiving, we arrived at 0900 - I picked her up at 1100, she was on complete bed rest until after Christmas now in months of PT. I have had to work and run the family now for almost two months, do Santa, school, vacation, shopping, taking my wife to doctors where she is well treated and professionally handled and you don’t see me bitchen.

You sound more like a whiner then a mature 50-60 year old.

How about knowing if there was an immediate problem, chances are the doctor would call you. I am guessing your blood test will come back so you will only complain someone else is not paying for your statin drugs.


10 posted on 01/05/2011 8:43:27 AM PST by edcoil (Democrat's and vampires should never be invited in your home.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: George from New England

Just curious, if you saw the Dr. on 12/8, and blood work was ordered, why wait until 12/27 to get the blood drawn, in the middle of two holidays? Fortunately, in CA, I can get copies of my blood work without the Dr.’s permission, and I do so regularly.

My son and his family have Kaiser, and I’m not a huge fan, however their blood test results are posted online immediately for them to view, whether they’ve talked to the Dr. or not. I don’t think the system is broken, I think your state needs to change their law, if you are forbidden from obtaining test results on your own.


11 posted on 01/05/2011 8:49:56 AM PST by Mjaye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: George from New England
The system is not broken. I usually get my blood test results in the afternoon after having the blood drawn in the morning.

Used to take a couple of days but they got an improved lab setup so a couple of tubes of blood is all it takes.

What you need to do is find a new doctor. I can't make you do that of course, but if you want a law in place that requires you to go somewhere else, Florida might well do that. See what they did to that Schiavo woman ~ once you get too problematic for them they just get rid of you down there.

12 posted on 01/05/2011 9:00:33 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: edcoil; Mrs. B.S. Roberts

Will people please SHUT THE HELL UP about the health care system in the 19th century?
Health care in the 19th century was relatively simple. Most of the time you just plain DIED....DEAD! Bad heart, kidney failure, a tumor anywhere, a badly cut limb, consumption, whooping cough, scarlet fever, bad heart valve...you died and the doctor unfortunately was sympathetic and comforting.
Now our “BROKEN SYSTEM” replaces heart valves and complete hearts, you get MRI’s that disclose a suspicious spot on your kidney, a lab tech fills out a report of a new blood problem.
There are now MRI’s, ultrasound tests, highly sophisticated everything tests, all taken by specialist technicians who feed data to the doctor who normally no longer has to hold you hand while you die.
Sure medicine was simpler in the 19th century. Most of the time NOTHING could be done and you died. No more problem. I truly wish a lot of people would shut up.


13 posted on 01/05/2011 9:05:41 AM PST by CaptainAmiigaf ( NY Times: We print the news as it fits our views.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: edcoil

A system where government programs distort prices by limiting compensation to doctors to the point that patients are receiving bills for $200 aspirin is broken.

A system where nobody will tell you how much the $200 aspirin is until AFTER you’ve already received care and been billed is broken.

A system where illegal aliens are pouring over the borders and getting their $200 aspirin for free is broken.

A system where a normal patient can’t afford simple medical procedures without pre-paying for care through an ‘insurance’ company is broken.

A system where that ‘insurance’ is somehow dependent upon the patient being tied down to a specific place of employment is not only broken, but just plain stupid.

It could all be fixed tomorrow if we were to get the government out of the business of expanding its own power and into the business of working in the interest of the American people. If only...


14 posted on 01/05/2011 9:06:03 AM PST by perfect_rovian_storm (The worst is behind us. Unfortunately it is really well endowed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: George from New England; CaptainAmiigaf; muawiyah
Modern Medicine has meant a lot to Maine.

People who used to die in February now linger on at great cost, inconvenience, and pain until May. But there is a bright side. At least in May the dead can be buried, instead of being stacked in a shed at the cemetery like frozen cordwood.

BTW, what is with this "bloodwork" fetish? I sure hope you are not taking any of these statin drugs to lower "high" cholesterol. Drop 25 pounds and take COQ10, Cod Liver Oil, pycnogenol,and grape seed extract, as heavy as you can stand. Take it in powder form mixed with water. Vitamin pills offer little or no rapid absorption, and most times none at all. Take a drink every evening. 2 OZ good whiskey. If you feel better, take another.
Remember what Dr. Holmes said,"If the entire pharmacopeia were to be thrown into the sea it would be a benefit to mankind and harmful for the fishes." He also said (or some old geezer did), "that we eat 1/3 out of necessity, 1/3 for pleasure, and 1/3 to support our physician." So eat 1/2 of what you eat now, fellow geezers, and quitchabellyachin'! My bill is in the mail.

BTW, if your appearance in short pants will not frighten women and children, get some exercise. Bike path?

15 posted on 01/05/2011 9:32:32 AM PST by Kenny Bunk (A pity Pinochet is still dead. He would have been ideal for 2012 ... or sooner.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: edcoil

>>Where is it broken?<<

The Doctor-Patient relationship has been seriously damaged.

I also agree with you that “What is broken is the government regulations attacking it and trial lawyers making millions from it.”


16 posted on 01/05/2011 9:33:31 AM PST by Mother Mary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kenny Bunk

I have a low cholesterol problem.


17 posted on 01/05/2011 9:34:54 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
I have a low cholesterol problem.

Take three Bushmills, with coffee and cheescake, and call me in the morning. Late in the morning.

18 posted on 01/05/2011 9:38:37 AM PST by Kenny Bunk (A pity Pinochet is still dead. He would have been ideal for 2012 ... or sooner.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: CaptainAmiigaf

“Sure medicine was simpler in the 19th century. Most of the time NOTHING could be done and you died. No more problem. I truly wish a lot of people would shut up”

HERE HERE YOU ARE SPOT ON!


19 posted on 01/05/2011 9:45:04 AM PST by Mrs. B.S. Roberts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Mother Mary

I believe overall it is not a federal issue. I go to my local doctor, hospital and rite-aid. I never cross a state line so there is not federal issue.

The only time I see a federal issue I cross state lines and need medical care getting those people paid is the only thing the feds might be involved in if I am using state aid from my state.


20 posted on 01/05/2011 9:50:38 AM PST by edcoil (Democrat's and vampires should never be invited in your home.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson