A worthy topic for discussion, but I hope not on this thread, since it's far from Zmirak's principle theme, which is the misuse of Scripture to justify illegal immigration.
In fact, I thought of editing Zmirak's article to eliminate such highly pruritic distractions, but decided that it would be too big an alteration of Dr. Z's characteristic style. I judged that most people would focus in on his main topic. I hope I have not judged rashly.
***A worthy topic for discussion, but I hope not on this thread,****
True. For a different thread at a different time.
Zmirak’s flippant comparison, of basically, “Luther was clearly wrong, so this why bleeding-heart Christians are also wrong” may work fine with the (small) minority of Roman Catholics on FreeRepublic, but is hardly an argument to bring up to the majority here, in a country established by (an overwhelming majority of) Protestant Founding Fathers.
Why does he alienate Protestants first off, when his arguments against illegal aliens are valid HOWEVER one thinks of Luther?
A great majority of Roman Catholics, like Jewish people, consistently, persistently vote liberal Democrat anyway...
A rather stupid method of political argumentation if you ask me.