Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Will a Leftist Takeover of the Military Precede a Leftist Military Takeover?
The New American ^ | December 31, 2010 | Selwyn Duke

Posted on 12/31/2010 4:54:46 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 last
To: 2ndDivisionVet

Comparing Obama to Caesar is an insult to Caesar. There wer some good things about Caesar at least.


61 posted on 12/31/2010 11:03:40 PM PST by Aetius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The senior officer ranks have been taken over for decades. Read their bios and all the schools they’ve attended.

The real warriors get burned out at staff level and retire as Lt Colonels or Full Birds. The Air Farce is ruled by the fighter pilot mafia made up of Engineering graduates. The Navy? See the Air Farce... Even SpecOps is showing the rot that’s infected everyone else.

Repeal of DADT allows open ...... to get appointed to service academies and further infect the officer’s ranks.

As of now and for the last 2 decades, enlisted combat arms ranks are rabid patriotic conservatives by about 90 percent.


62 posted on 12/31/2010 11:27:00 PM PST by Tailback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

This makes being in the resistance fun. THEY ARE LAME.


63 posted on 01/01/2011 12:17:38 AM PST by screaminsunshine (Americanism vs Communism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: 6SJ7

“Number of guns in America 276 million...”

I don’t know where you found that number but I suspect it is grossly undercount.


64 posted on 01/01/2011 12:41:11 AM PST by SatinDoll (NO FOREIGN NATIONALS AS OUR PRESIDENT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: 6SJ7

And that is the “real” reason there will not be some kind of armed takeover. Even after training, those guys still can’t shoot straight.


65 posted on 01/01/2011 6:01:17 AM PST by wbarmy (I chose to be a sheepdog once I saw what happens to the sheep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I think this writer is onto something here. An army of pantywaists like Barack would support him. That doesn’t mean they wouldn’t be forceful, even cruel.


66 posted on 01/01/2011 6:40:44 AM PST by RoadTest (Religion is a substitute for the relationship God wants with you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pnh102

“Frankly, I subscribe to the maxim, “Never attribute to malice what is better explained by stupidity.”
Heh. Big mistake. Especially when it comes to liberalism. :)”

I agree. Things don’t just happen; they are caused.


67 posted on 01/01/2011 6:42:00 AM PST by RoadTest (Religion is a substitute for the relationship God wants with you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

“Zampolit”

At one time the Red Army’s `political officers’ had veto power, a commander’s order could not be carried out unless it was countersigned by the zampolit.

Anyway, look at what the U.S. Army has as the equivalent of the old Soviet zampolit: your unit Equal Opportunity officer (additional duty, often assigned to a minority officer) who forwards racial bias complaints, the Inspector General (who always asks if the chain of command has been consulted first), the AR 15-6 investigation process, and then there is the Congressional inquiry that can require a great deal of the commander’s time in response.

Now.... my experience with all four venues is that the system is generally good at screening out spurious or superfluous complaints. However, if the SecArmy and the Army chief of staff roll over about DADT repeal, those four could be turned into dangerous weapons of poltical correctness, indeed.

Just one old soldier’s opinion. I retire this month.


68 posted on 01/01/2011 7:04:07 AM PST by elcid1970 ("O Muslim! My bullets are dipped in pig grease!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: screaminsunshine

> The Left is too Stoopid to take anything over.

How, then, do you explain their 80+ years of virtually complete domination of Eastern Europe and most of Asia, as well as their continuing grip on China, their growing dominance in Latin America, and their dominance here in the States?


69 posted on 01/01/2011 7:17:16 AM PST by Westbrook (Having children does not divide your love, it multiplies it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: screaminsunshine

“The Left is too Stoopid to take anything over.”
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Please tell me that you really don’t think that. The only way I can agree is that they are stupid to believe as they believe but their roaring success in taking over and destroying almost everything that has made this country great certainly belies the notion that they are too stupid to take anything over.


70 posted on 01/01/2011 9:29:52 AM PST by RipSawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Under orders of the old comintern in the early 30’s the left and their fellow travelers began the process of infiltrating every institution. With the publication of Gramsci’s works the left embarked on the deconstructionalist strategy that he envisioned. Like a cancer it infected EVERY SINGLE institution in the west. Their mission the total destruction of western civilization without having anything viable to replace it. Why would the left’s efficiency have somehow left out institutions such as the military and the GOP? They have been in the hands of the left since day one.


71 posted on 01/01/2011 10:10:18 AM PST by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Black Agnes

ping to above.


72 posted on 01/01/2011 10:13:00 AM PST by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: 6SJ7; SatinDoll

My own estimate on “number of guns in America” is closer to 350 million.

The quote a decade ago was 250 million, and the ATF has been logging about 10 million transfers (background checks) per year since then.

Some of those transfers are used guns, just changing owners and some are multiple guns per transfer, so I’m calling it, as a rough estimate, one new gun per background check.


73 posted on 01/01/2011 12:59:11 PM PST by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson