Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama to give Manhattan back to Native Americans
World Net Daily ^ | Dec. 26, 2010 | Eugene J. Koprowski

Posted on 12/30/2010 10:55:38 AM PST by re_tail20

President Obama is voicing support for a U.N. resolution that could accomplish something as radical as relinquishing some U.S. sovereignty and opening a path for the return of ancient tribal lands to American Indians, including even parts of Manhattan.

The issue is causing alarm among legal experts.

In recent remarks at the White House during a "tribal nations conference," Obama endorsed the "United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous People," which includes a sweeping declaration that "indigenous peoples have a right to lands and resources they traditionally occupied or otherwise used" but that later were acquired by occupying forces.

Read the scoop on the United Nations, in "The Beast on the East River"

"U.N. resolutions like this claiming amorphous rights can be a stalking horse for future attempts to have international courts enforce broad interpretations of those rights at the expense of American sovereignty," Theodore Frank, a fellow with the Center for Legal Policy at the Manhattan Institute, a leading public policy think tank in New York City, told WND.

Academic legal experts indicate that American Indians during the Carter era first drew up plans for reacquisition of lost tribal lands, setting the stage for the U.N. resolution that Obama is embracing. The feasibility study, eyeing 650 million acres of federally owned land in the U.S., was conducted by the Indian Education Institute at Eastern Oregon State, one expert recalled for WND.

"Re-purchase would restore land back to its original owners thus strengthening tribal sovereignty and jurisdiction over its people and land," Julianne Jennings Nottoway, a professor of anthropology at Pima Community College in Tuscon, Ariz., said. "Also, it would allow tribes the opportunity to develop socially, politically and economically as competitors as nation-states within a global context under the act of self-determination."

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: Government; US: New York
KEYWORDS: 200yrstoolate; indians; nativeamericans; obamamanhattan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-143 next last
To: montyspython

Whomever Kennewick man’s descendants are do because he predates “Native Americans” by a long shot.

[note that *everyone* “recognized” the definitively ~European~ face as -Scottish- Patrick Stewart]


101 posted on 12/30/2010 12:46:24 PM PST by Salamander (Can't sleep....the clowns will eat me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Allegra

She signed up 10 days too late.

:)


102 posted on 12/30/2010 12:49:00 PM PST by Salamander (Can't sleep....the clowns will eat me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: WXRGina

“Welcome to the “conversation” between me and Allegra.”

Oh, we’re sorry.

Are you two in a private chat room?

Please, do pardon everyone on FR for eavesdropping.


103 posted on 12/30/2010 12:53:23 PM PST by Salamander (Can't sleep....the clowns will eat me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: WXRGina
You’re very sensitive.

Judgment. Without much of a foundation. Did you see the "LOL" in my response? Yes, I was laughing.

I was not using “tough talk” in my question. “What’s your problem with WND?” is not tough; it’s just a question.

Cute. Your "question" was followed by your questioning my Christianity. You kind of left that part out, didn't you? Beleive me, anybody with half a brain can discern the tone of your post.

I’m used to seeing people ridicule and disparage WND, and most of them are put off by WND’s Christian perspective or what they perceive to be yellow journalism.

With me it's the latter - the hyperbole. What's your problem with someone daring to voice an opinon that differs from your own? In a benign manner, no less.

My assumption that it might be the Christianity of it was just that—an assumption.

Yes, and a baseless and rather crude assumption at that.

Those of us with eyes to see have ALL seen how the “media” twists and distorts the facts of life.

Not necessarily. My observations certainly differ.

Never mind.

You can't admit you might have been wrong and out of line, so this is the tack, eh? Frustrated by the fact that you aren't successful at peeing on my shoes and telling me it's raining? ;-)

"Never mind" is the appropriate approach if you're going to continue to spin and try to snow me.

I didn't just fall off the turnip truck yesterday, y'know.

If you can't take what you dish out, then keep your snarkiness to yourself. Otherwise, learn to deal with the consequences.

104 posted on 12/30/2010 1:09:12 PM PST by Allegra (You're a towel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Salamander
Are you two in a private chat room?

LOL - not me! Not with her! No way!

I shudder to imagine...heeheehee

105 posted on 12/30/2010 1:12:41 PM PST by Allegra (You're a towel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Salamander
She signed up 10 days too late.

HAHAHAHAHAHA....good catch. Just take one of the "1"s off and it's accurate.

106 posted on 12/30/2010 1:14:36 PM PST by Allegra (You're a towel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Allegra

Very good!

You can overthink these things, you know...

:-)


107 posted on 12/30/2010 1:16:44 PM PST by WXRGina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke

I think ancestor.com will be receiving a lot of hits.
Somewhere I have Indian blood. “Sweet”


108 posted on 12/30/2010 1:19:23 PM PST by savage woman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Salamander

Yes—A private chat room at the Silly Season Inn where it takes all kinds.

Marvelous, just marvelous you are!


109 posted on 12/30/2010 1:19:46 PM PST by WXRGina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: WXRGina
You can overthink these things, you know...

You certainly can and that tends to lead to baseless assumptions. ;-)

110 posted on 12/30/2010 1:23:35 PM PST by Allegra (You're a towel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day
Peter Minuit bought it fair and square.

And my great-great-jiggledy-squared-grandfather was there as a witness to it.

So give it back to the Dutch and see what they want to do with it.

111 posted on 12/30/2010 1:32:34 PM PST by Tanniker Smith (I didn't know she was a liberal when I married her.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: EBH

Very interesting! I never knew that.


112 posted on 12/30/2010 1:34:39 PM PST by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Tanniker Smith; EBH
"Peter Minuit bought it fair and square."

And my great-great-jiggledy-squared-grandfather was there as a witness to it.

So give it back to the Dutch and see what they want to do with it.

Sorry, but...

Even old New York was once New Amsterdam
Why they changed it I can't say
People just liked it better that way...

113 posted on 12/30/2010 1:36:14 PM PST by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: familyof5

You remember Van Jones, the guy Beck got fired from this administration, he was saying the same thing so Obama must be listening to an avowed communists.


114 posted on 12/30/2010 1:41:43 PM PST by Americanexpat (Everytime I see that guy's face ot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Allegra

Yes! And lots of other assorted rabbit trails...


115 posted on 12/30/2010 1:41:51 PM PST by WXRGina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day
Why they changed it? I can say ...
It had something to do with the British Navy sailing into the harbor...

Now that Constantinople thing? That's a completely different matter altogether.

116 posted on 12/30/2010 1:46:02 PM PST by Tanniker Smith (I didn't know she was a liberal when I married her.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Tanniker Smith

I’ve heard that’s nobody’s business but the Turks. YMMV. :)


117 posted on 12/30/2010 1:49:05 PM PST by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Lady Jag

You mean its not? ;>)


118 posted on 12/30/2010 1:55:56 PM PST by Americanexpat (Everytime I see that guy's face ot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: redpoll

Come on, your PC sense is better than that! The Dutch don’t get anything out of this, the Canarsie win.


119 posted on 12/30/2010 2:11:34 PM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: SnakeDoctor

wow didn’t you hit the nail on the head with this one! great comment my friend!


120 posted on 12/30/2010 2:16:32 PM PST by MissDairyGoodnessVT ( JC Webster's fav words: "the boiling pits of sewage" roflmao)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-143 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson