Judgment. Without much of a foundation. Did you see the "LOL" in my response? Yes, I was laughing.
I was not using “tough talk” in my question. “What’s your problem with WND?” is not tough; it’s just a question.
Cute. Your "question" was followed by your questioning my Christianity. You kind of left that part out, didn't you? Beleive me, anybody with half a brain can discern the tone of your post.
I’m used to seeing people ridicule and disparage WND, and most of them are put off by WND’s Christian perspective or what they perceive to be yellow journalism.
With me it's the latter - the hyperbole. What's your problem with someone daring to voice an opinon that differs from your own? In a benign manner, no less.
My assumption that it might be the Christianity of it was just that—an assumption.
Yes, and a baseless and rather crude assumption at that.
Those of us with eyes to see have ALL seen how the “media” twists and distorts the facts of life.
Not necessarily. My observations certainly differ.
Never mind.
You can't admit you might have been wrong and out of line, so this is the tack, eh? Frustrated by the fact that you aren't successful at peeing on my shoes and telling me it's raining? ;-)
"Never mind" is the appropriate approach if you're going to continue to spin and try to snow me.
I didn't just fall off the turnip truck yesterday, y'know.
If you can't take what you dish out, then keep your snarkiness to yourself. Otherwise, learn to deal with the consequences.
Very good!
You can overthink these things, you know...
:-)